A test for prospective prison officers has been criticised for targeting people “with the arithmetical skills of a seven-year old” instead of those with the necessary caring abilities.
The self-assessment test measures the skills a prison officer would use on the job and was published on the prison service website last week.
The questions include basic mathematical exercises such as asking candidates to divide equally fish fingers on five trays, each containing 24, among 40 prisoners.
Frances Crook, director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: “The prison service is looking for men and women who have the arithmetical skills of a seven-year-old but doesn’t care if they have no values, interest in the issues or concern for human beings.”
The online test is a shortened version of the main one used by the prison service. Prison officers do not need formal qualifications in English or maths.
Test at www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/careersandjobs/post
Test for officers ignores caring skills
November 16, 2005 in Community Care
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Featured jobs
Workforce Insights
- Working with perpetrators of domestic abuse: training social workers to have challenging conversations
- Extending support: the importance of reflective supervision beyond the ASYE
- ‘It’s hopeful work’: social work in an adults’ mental health team
- Podcast: supporting adults with learning disabilities and autism post-pandemic
- ‘There aren’t many roles where you get to take a child on holiday’: the benefits of residential care work
- Workforce Insights – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Community Care Inform
Latest stories
Finley Boden: professionals should have protected baby murdered by his parents, review finds
Regulator calls for consistency of support for NQSWs as DfE develops children’s early career framework
Leadership training programme launched for PSWs, AMHP leads and principal OTs in adults’ services
Kent ‘extremely close to capacity’ to care for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Comments are closed.