It appears the government has listened to disabled groups in putting together its plans for incapacity benefit reform – but only to a point.
Incentives like the Pathways to Work scheme, which offers financial incentives as well as a guarantee that people can return to their original benefit levels if their return to employment is unsuccessful, encouragement through work-focused interviews, and a higher rate of benefit for those who are “genuinely” incapable of work look like genuine improvements, as is the promise that assessments will focus on people’s capabilities rather than their disabilities.
Added to the Access to Work programme, offering advice and financial support to employers who employ disabled people, and the anti-discrimination legislation, which will demand compliance from all employers, and tax credits, it would seem that disabled people will have unprecedented employment opportunities. And all of these acknowledge the social model of disability, rather than the medical model, and seem to be aimed at encouraging people to take responsibility for their lives, and to move out of a mentality of dependency.
But what about the other financial benefits – through income support – such as council tax relief, housing benefit and free prescriptions, which have kept many disabled people from destitution but also trapped them within the benefit system?
With proposals that GPs will receive incentives to reduce the number of sick notes that they write, or that eligibility for incapacity benefit will be decided by interview – presumably by a civil servant – with reductions in benefits for those who don’t “co-operate”, I can see that many of my colleagues with less visible disabilities, with mental health problems, learning difficulties and variable conditions like ME, will be branded as workshy.
One other set of considerations: the government estimates that one million people will stop claiming incapacity benefit. Where will these jobs appear from? Many employers are prejudiced against employing disabled people, particularly those with mental health problems. Is anti-discrimination legislation going to be strong enough to deal with these prejudices?
The Simon Heng Column
February 1, 2006 in Autism, Children, Disability, Mental Health
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Featured jobs
Workforce Insights
- Working with perpetrators of domestic abuse: training social workers to have challenging conversations
- Extending support: the importance of reflective supervision beyond the ASYE
- ‘It’s hopeful work’: social work in an adults’ mental health team
- Podcast: supporting adults with learning disabilities and autism post-pandemic
- ‘There aren’t many roles where you get to take a child on holiday’: the benefits of residential care work
- Workforce Insights – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Community Care Inform
Latest stories
Regulator calls for consistency of support for NQSWs as DfE develops children’s early career framework
Leadership training programme launched for PSWs, AMHP leads and principal OTs in adults’ services
Kent ‘extremely close to capacity’ to care for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Frisbee Crockery: a girl’s journey from abusive home to safety in care
Comments are closed.