Children’s services chiefs say ‘no’ to letting for-profit companies run child protection

The Association of Directors of Children's Services says Department for Education outsourcing plan could create 'perverse incentives' in the social care system

Statement lays out required skills for children's social workers Photo: Gary Brigden

Children’s services bosses have warned ministers not to let councils outsource child protection functions to for-profit companies.

In its response to the consultation on the Department for Education’s plans to allow councils to farm out child protection and other social work functions to external organisations, the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS) says these services “should not be predicated on a profit motive”.

“Decisions taken about a child’s life should only ever be based on what is in the best interests of the child as assessed by skilled and qualified social workers and the court system,” says the ADCS response.

“These decisions cannot, and must not, be subordinate to the pursuit of financial profit. There is a serious risk of perverse financial incentives (direct or indirect) that could potentially distort decisions in individual care cases, for example, to intervene or not, to take a child into care or not.”

Instead the ADCS says the government’s plans should only allow child protection work to be delegated to not-for-profit organisations, including other local authorities.

It says that while a “very small number of local authorities” have requested the ability to outsource social care functions, they are doing so “in the spirit of localism” and intend for the democratic accountability to remain with councils.

The ADCS response adds that local authorities should not be able to delegate their duty of care to children and questions how child protection inspections could work in a system where councils commission rather than provide these services.

“The very serious potential for these proposals to distort the position of a single local point of accountability for children and young people is best exemplified by the idea that a provider would be inspected by Ofsted and then the local authority ‘awarded’ the judgment,” it says.

“This situation is untenable as it would require the local authority to employ an army of ‘checkers’ to ensure contract compliance.”

It adds that the effects of creating a market in social care can be seen in children’s homes, where placements have ended up unevenly distributed across the country resulting in children being placed at significant distances from their home authorities.

The response also urges the government to conduct further consultations should it decide to pursue its plans due to the risk of unintended consequences.

The ADCS response to the proposals follows criticisms of the plans from many sector bodies including Unison, the College of Social Work, the British Association of Social Workers and social work academics.

More from Community Care

3 Responses to Children’s services chiefs say ‘no’ to letting for-profit companies run child protection

  1. Gerald June 5, 2014 at 11:37 am #

    There seems to be only one objection here,as far as I can understand it and that is that Private Companies have to make a profit, surely the Public or so called Volluntary Sectors should understand that the whole of the British and most of the Worlds economic system would not operate with this happening.
    Why can we not just concentrate on getting a good system organised to protect the children and stop involving outdated Politic Dogma.

  2. snowmoon June 5, 2014 at 12:32 pm #

    Thank you!

  3. Dan, Completely Care Ltd June 6, 2014 at 1:03 pm #

    Where our main office is based, in Oxfordshire, the child protection team in my experience are helpful and professional, balanced in thier approach and efficient in providing advice and support.

    I am not convinced that outsourcing a service like this will result in improvments.

    Especially based on other examples of government outsourcing in recent years. Child protection should be one of the core services provided by local government and they should do everything they can to hold on to it.

    It seems to me that the main motivation for outsourcing this function would be to pass on the liability and surely this would not be a good thing.

    Dan, Completely Care Ltd