Adult social services directors expect fewer people to receive care, increased pressure on the NHS and a rise in legal challenges as a result of this year’s budget cuts.
The annual budget survey by the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (Adass) found councils in England have had to make cuts of 26% in their social care budgets, or £3.53bn, once inflation and demographic pressures are taken into account.
This year the amount councils spend on services will fall by 1.9 per cent or £266m to £13.68bn excluding charges levied on service users and money from other public bodies for particular projects.
Budgets will get even tighter next year as government funding for councils fall by a further 10%, Adass added. It said this would create further instability as councils implement the the Care Act 2014 reforms and the Better Care Fund to pool £3.8bn of health and social care funding.
Adass president David Pearson said the survey showed the sector had reached the point where it was “unable to absorb the pressures” of rising demand for services and falling public spending.
Demand growing but fewer people getting sevices
Adass said the number of people looking for adult care support from their council rose by 14% from 2010 to 2014, but the proportion deemed eligible for council-funded services dropped by 5.8 per cent last year alone and has fallen by 28% since 2008-9.
The largest drop in people deemed eligible in 2013-14 was among older people receiving services in the community.
“We are concerned about what is happening to people who may not be having their needs met,” said Pearson. “There needs to be investment in social care to make sure people get the quality and extent of care they need and deserve.”
Nearly half of directors surveyed by Adass think fewer people will be able to get care services as a result of the reductions, the same proportion expect people will get smaller personal budgets and 50% say there will be greater pressure on the NHS. Over half of directors said care providers would face financial difficulty as a result of the budget pressures and nearly 60% expect there to be more legal challenges of councils by care providers and users.
Procurement survey raises quality and pay concerns
Meanwhile another Adass survey published today found 8.6% of residential and nursing home providers and 6% of home care providers are under enhanced monitoring by councils because of fears about the quality of the service.
Adass’s procurement survey said these concerns led councils to cancel contracts with 41 residential and home care providers over the past year.
It also found that about 15% of home care visits were 15 minutes long, a practice that has been much criticised for leading to rushed visits to deliver personal care.
Adass found that most 15-minute visits were not for personal care but to check on someone’s wellbeing or prompt them to take medication; however some were for other tasks. Adass said councils needed to “reassure themselves” that the length of the visits were suitable since short appointments may not be adequate to help people with washing, dressing or going to the toilet.
While 71% of councils thought the the domiciliary care companies they used paid the minimum wage or more, just 3% were confident the firms paid the living wage, which is higher. Adass said councils should tell HM Revenue and Customs if they believed the companies paid less than the minimum wage.
Just 5% of councils were confident that the providers paid their staff for their travel between appointments at their standard hourly rate and only 16% thought the firms paid travel expenses to their staff. Adass said councils should work with providers to establish the true cost of care and local and national government should recognise that improving services will have rising costs.
Adass and the Local Government Association will publish a guide to commissioning services based on outcomes rather than time and task in the autumn.
Government places responsibility on councils for reductions
A Department of Health spokesperson said: “We have given an extra £1.1bn to councils to help protect social care services this year — that’s on top of significant additional funding in recent years. Councils are ultimately responsible for deciding how to spend their budgets but we agree that we all need to work differently to respond to the challenge of our growing ageing population — the Care Act and the Better Care Fund will focus resources on helping people to live independently, which can save money and prevent people from needing more support.”
The DH also said councils could use their reserves, reduce fraud and increase council tax collection in order to put more money into services.
The £1.1bn is the latest tranche of an annual transfer of NHS resource to fund social care services that help relieve pressures on the NHS and drive integration, which will be replaced by the Better Care Fund next year.
However, Richard Humphries, assistant director for policy at health think tank The King’s Fund, said Adass’s survey showed half of the NHS transfer was being used to protect social care services from cuts, not support integration.
“Using NHS funding as a sticking plaster does not deal with the significant challenges facing social care, nor does it help address the emerging funding pressures facing the NHS. With the NHS and social care budgets under huge strain, questions about funding are becoming increasingly urgent – politicians must be honest about the scale of these pressures and initiate a public debate about the sustainability of the health and social care system before, not after, the general election.”
2015 is ‘make or break’ year for social care
Merrick Cockell, chair of the Local Government Association, called for a bigger Better Care Fund lasting five years to support integration of social care and health. He said: “Next year will be a make or break for local services provided by councils and for the NHS and it will be the most vulnerable families and older people in our communities that will feel the brunt of such a severely underfunded service. Less money in social care will have an inevitable impact on councils’ ability to relieve the pressure on a similarly squeezed NHS by keeping people out of hospital and in the community. Too many older people are being let down by a broken system which leaves them languishing in hospital beds while they wait for an alternative, or consigned to residential care because we lack the capacity to help them live independently.”
Assistive technology and dementia: practice tips 
A trauma-informed approach to social work: practice tips 
Find out how to develop your emotional resilience with our free downloadable guide 
Develop your social work career with Community Care’s Careers and Training Guide 
‘Dear Sajid Javid: please end the inappropriate detention of autistic people and those with learning disabilities’
Ofsted calls for power to scrutinise children’s home groups
Seven in eight commissioners paying below ‘minimum rate for home care’
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Instagram
Perhaps if we didn’t pay heads of service so much or cut back on middle management we might have enough to support front line workers and ultimately service users.Time to use the private sector more and stop misuse of council funds by paying exorbitant wages to staff who have union negotiated salaries.
As a Carer in the NHS based in the social care side with Learning disabilities, and a user of a private care company for my mother. I have to add my point about the wages we receive, we do a fantastic job and are quite often the only person our Service Users see, My wages will by the end of July have been cut by £8000 a year over the last two years, and the ladies who do a great job with my Mum earn the basic wage and as the report says get a small amount traveling time in between clocking into each visit, They have to work a twelve hour day to get a days pay. Staff are leaving in their droves both in the public and private sectors, we can get the same money stacking shelf’s. We realize that things have to change, but its about time the workers are valued by all concerned, they often do things in their own time to help the people we support.I speak to people every day on both sides of the sectors and on all levels,and there are very few who are not thinking of leaving the job they have chosen and in most cases love, because of the stress and expectations that are being placed on us.