Average social worker caseloads: the highest and the lowest

Three of the top five local authorities for average social worker caseloads rated 'good' by Ofsted

cases
Photo: mnirat/Fotolia

With the latest government statistics reporting an average caseload per child and family social worker of 17.8 nationally, Community Care wanted to see which local authorities were reporting higher or lower than ‘average’ caseloads down across their workforce.

Of the five local authorities with the highest reported average caseload per social worker, three were rated as ‘good’ by Ofsted in their most recent full inspection. Conversely, Darlington, with the fourth lowest average, was rated ‘inadequate’.

Kensington and Chelsea, one of only three councils with a current rating of ‘outstanding’, is second in the government table of lowest averages.

The national average cannot be compared with last year’s reported average of 16 as data this year was collected at individual social worker level, said the report. It advised care in interpreting the figures as “local
authorities have reported difficulties with linking the number of cases and the social worker holding those
cases”.

Across the national workforce, the statistics report that just over half (51%) of full-time equivalent workers are caseholders. However, the report goes on to say that while the proportion of these vary buy local authority, some had difficulty mapping their local roles to those identified in the collection of the data.

See below for the local authorities reporting the highest and lowest average caseholds per worker.

Lowest average caseloads by local authority

Local authority Number of caseholders Average caseload per child and family social worker Last Ofsted inspection rating
Kingston upon Thames/Richmond upon Thames 65.1 10.2 Good
Kensington and Chelsea 59.2 11.9 Outstanding
Hertfordshire 240.3 12.4 Good
Darlington 58.4 12.5 Inadequate
Sutton 72.1 12.9 Good

Highest average caseloads by local authority

Local authority Number of caseholders Average caseload per child and family social worker Last Ofsted inspection rating
Staffordshire 199.4 26.4 Good
Shropshire 77.7 25.1 Good
Kingston upon Hull 142.3 24.5 Requires improvement
Southampton 80.5 23.9 Requires improvement
Blackburn with Darwen 59.4 23.8 Good

Source: Children’s social work workforce 2018

13 Responses to Average social worker caseloads: the highest and the lowest

  1. Denise February 15, 2018 at 3:18 pm #

    My caseload has never yet been below 30 in 22 years of social work practice!

    • Tracey February 15, 2018 at 9:02 pm #

      The ‘highest’ caseloads seem low to me – I had that many children on my caseload while working part time! Did I miss whether caseload is measured as number of individual children or families?

      • Marion wood February 16, 2018 at 6:16 pm #

        Tracey you have hit the nail on the head. What are they measuring?

  2. Peevy February 15, 2018 at 4:05 pm #

    K+C counts their caseload by family rather than children!

  3. Mr Ever Hopeful February 15, 2018 at 9:36 pm #

    At one point when I was frontline I had 64 cases. I don’t want a medal I just want a job to be manageable.

  4. Diane February 16, 2018 at 9:56 am #

    I am surprised by these average figures because I have known caseloads to be as high as 40 at times.

  5. tcm February 16, 2018 at 11:05 am #

    not sure how these figures have been calculated? Not my experience in front line teams like First Response and Safeguarding?

  6. Anita Singh February 16, 2018 at 11:52 am #

    When weighting a case load, there is a lack of clarity as to whether the author is writing about individual children or whole families when quoting the numbers. It is important to know what percentage of cases were CP, subject to the PLO process or if proceedings are to be initiated or have already begun, % of CIN cases etc. It is too simplistic to say well the average caseload across the country is X number of cases, as even a worker who appears to have a very reasonable caseload, may be heavily loaded due to the complexity and sheer extent of paperwork generated by proceedings. Other issues such as the number of kinship assessments to be undertaken, especially if there are multiple family members putting themselves forward or multiple carers due to the number of children needing care. Whether they are some distance away from the LA area and whether children are placed some distance away from the area and/or in separate/multiple placements requiring numerous separate visits also adds hugely to the work. If children are subject to multiple processes, where one process is still ongoing but needs to be ended such as going from CP to LAC Status, this generates huge amounts of bureaucracy and a lot of extra work in front of a computer system that is half-functional most of the time. More than one process leads to multiple reports for Case Conferences and LAC reviews. Other missing information in this article is knowing how many extra hours SWs are putting in to the job, which may account for some of the ‘Good’ or ‘Outstanding’ Ofsted ratings and does not take into account the amount of unpaid overtime and burnout. This article conveniently skips much essential detail

  7. Dave February 18, 2018 at 10:55 am #

    Those figures don’t reflect my experiences, or that of colleagues in other areas. Case loads are much higher that the highest quoted across the board

  8. mark February 18, 2018 at 1:12 pm #

    Good point Tracey!

    But whether it’s children or families, the numbers are still high in certain areas, added to that having ASYE’S (who have reduced and protected caseloads), sickness, training, and other meetings etc its not always manageable. No one really listens so the only way is to work as long as you can and then hopefully get out and do something else.

    Very demoralising to be honest.

    • Jade February 19, 2018 at 7:24 pm #

      The “Reduced and Protected Caseloads” for ASYE’s are a total myth. I’m an ASYE and have regularly had over 30 children allocated to me in a front line Children’s Assessment and Safeguarding Team.

  9. zoe February 18, 2018 at 9:48 pm #

    please can we stop using the term ‘caseload’ and perhaps say number of children/families working with? cases – really – is that what the people we work with are? #peoplenotcases

  10. Alison Blunt February 22, 2018 at 1:24 pm #

    Don’t forget that this is an average, so there will be people with less (ASYE and students) and then of course those with more. That’s how an average works.

Leave a Reply