The UK has the highest rate of teenage
pregnancies in western Europe, something that the government seems
determined to change. But has it struck the right balance between
providing for teenage mothers and taking action that might lead to
a fall in the number of teenagers becoming parents? Ruth Winchester
reports.
Last month, the Department of Health published
research showing that babies born to teenage mothers are 60 per
cent more likely to die in their first year than those born to
older parents.1 The research concludes that halving the
number of teenage pregnancies could prevent the deaths of 100
babies each year.
These shocking figures may help refocus
ministerial attention on the ongoing teenage pregnancy strategy,
put in place by the government in response to a report by the
government's social exclusion unit (SEU) in 1999.2 The
report laid out for the first time the causes of teenage pregnancy,
and the long-term social exclusion, ill-health and poor prospects
that teenage pregnancy fosters.
The latest figures show that in England in
1999 there were just over 39,000 conceptions to young women under
18. A fifth of those - 7,400 - were to girls under the age of 16.
The UK has the highest rate of teenage conceptions among western
European countries - three times the rate in France and six times
that of the Netherlands.3
Those most at risk of teenage pregnancy are
children and young adults who are already disadvantaged by poverty,
problems with education and low self-esteem. The risk of becoming a
teenage mother is almost 10 times higher for a girl from the lowest
social class, compared with a girl from a professional
background.
Predictably, children in the care system and
those who have been excluded from school are among the worst
affected. One in four looked-after children becomes a parent before
the age of 16, and nearly half of looked-after young women are
mothers by the time they become fully independent. Society's
attitudes are undoubtedly playing a part in this polarisation. As
one youth worker said: "If you're pregnant and from a middle class
area, they offer you a termination. If you come from a poor area
they call the midwife."
Of the 39,000 conceptions in 1999, a little
over 22,000 resulted in births - and the consequences of teenage
parenthood can be incapacitating. Without education or training and
with little access to child care, these young families are trapped
in desolate, impoverished conditions with little hope of escape. Up
to 90 per cent of teenage mothers are reliant on benefits, and
while some have access to affordable social housing, most end up
extremely isolated, often in unsuitable accommodation, and usually
without appropriate services or support.
The consequences can be dire, as the DoH
mortality statistics mentioned above reveal. But more often lives
are ruined rather than lost. Teenage mothers are more likely to
suffer postnatal and other forms of depression than older parents.
They are more likely to smoke during and after the pregnancy, seek
medical advice later than older women, and many have little idea
about healthy eating and the needs of growing children. As well as
long-term health problems, these children often become victims of
the same cycle of poverty, low aspirations, low achievement and
unemployment that their parents succumbed to. And so the cycle
continues: children born to teenage mothers are significantly more
likely to become teenage parents in their turn.
Given the misery that teenage pregnancies can
generate, the government has taken a pragmatic approach to the
problem. Rather than insisting that teenage pregnancy is a social
evil that must be stamped out, it has opted to improve the
availability of contraception, educate young people better about
sex and relationships, and ensure that those who do become parents
have the support they need to ensure that they and their children
flourish.
The teenage pregnancy unit4
(TPU)was set up to implement the 30-point action plan outlined in
the SEU's 1999 report. The unit's brief is, more specifically, to
halve the rate of conceptions among under-18s in England by 2010,
and to reduce the risk of long-term social exclusion for teenage
parents and their children by getting more of them into education,
training and employment. The unit is funded by a wide range of
government departments and its work is woven into a range of other
government initiatives including Sure Start, Connexions and
Supporting People.
The work is centred around two core strands -
preventing teenagers getting pregnant in the first place, and
supporting those who do become parents. Prevention work is perhaps
the most controversial area, and the unit is likely to face some
tough challenges in the next few years. Most recently, the
multi-disciplinary advisory group overseeing and guiding the work
of the TPU have made it clear they believe targeted and proactive
sex education is essential for children and teenagers before they
reach 16 - an ideal that some parents and pressure groups are
vocally opposed to. Even more controversially, there has been a
public statement to the effect that children need approachable and
confidential contraceptive services before the age of 16.
The advisory group, chaired by Lady Winifred
Tumim, has laid its cards on the table by stating that barriers to
contraceptive services and advice should be removed for the
under-16s. In a recent article, Tumim argued: "All young people
should have better access to confidential health services,
including full contraception, on secondary school premises where
appropriate."
Gill Frances is deputy chairperson of the
advisory group, and head of the children's development unit at the
National Children's Bureau. She says: "I'm very excited about it
[the teenage pregnancy strategy] which isn't something I say often
about government initiatives. It puts teenage pregnancy in the
context of sexual health for the first time and says we have to
sort our services out. If you look at other European countries,
some of them have very pragmatic approaches to sexual health and
sex education. In Holland, who do you think teenagers ask about
sex? Their parents. In the UK? It's their peers or a help line.
That tells us something."
Frances believes that young people should have
straightforward, uncomplicated access to sexual health services,
which means putting services into schools, youth clubs and drop-in
centres - anywhere they congregate. She acknowledges that there may
be trouble ahead, but insists: "All the research tells us that the
vast majority of parents don't want their children to get pregnant,
they don't want them to catch sexually transmitted diseases, and
they don't want them to have their hearts broken. There will always
be a small percentage of parents who make a fuss about it, but we
should be making policy that addresses the needs of the majority
rather than panders to the sentiments of a very small
minority."
She also argues that sex education and
contraceptive services should be deliberately targeted at those
young men and women who are most likely to become parents. "I'm not
saying that those who are not at high risk shouldn't get it -
they're entitled to it and they need it. I'm saying that the high
risk groups, like children in care, need more of it and they need
it earlier."
On the support side, 20 Sure Start Plus pilots
are being run in the 20 districts in England with the worst teenage
pregnancy rates.5 The scheme is an extension of the
national under-fours Sure Start scheme, but aimed specifically at
teenage parents. It has four key targets - improving teenage
parents' health, increasing the number who breastfeed, getting more
teenage parents to stop smoking, and improving learning.
Janet Kent is scheme co-ordinator for the
Wakefield Young Families Project, run by Barnardo's, one of the
Sure Start Plus pilots. It works with 80 young families, and runs
schemes such as antenatal classes, social groups, education and
training for teenage parents. A new scheme called Food Direct
delivers locally grown produce, together with recipes and
suggestions, to parents' homes.
According to Kent, the teenagers she works
with have a lot of potential, but many have had difficult
experiences at school and have become isolated as a result of their
pregnancy. She says: "What we've found is that they aren't
accessing services at all, either because they don't know about
them or feel too intimidated to try them. A lot of them feel that
they can't use mainstream services like antenatal classes, they
tell us that the midwives are hostile to them and that the other
people at classes look down on them. So we have a midwife who works
specifically with young women, who is encouraging. If they want us
to, we go and visit the delivery suite so that they feel more
comfortable about the whole thing."
The Wakefield project is offering taster
sessions and short courses to help young parents back into
education, and offering longer courses. Kent says that the young
women have "grabbed the opportunity with both hands. They want
education, training and work".
Unfortunately there are still stumbling blocks
for teenage parents who are keen to get back into education and
training. According to Kent: "Child care is a very difficult area -
there is no provision for child care unless you can afford a
private nursery. There are some local authority places but they
tend to be for children over two who are already potty trained. All
the young women we see have young babies, which is a real barrier."
The Wakefield project came up with the idea of a mobile creche,
staffed by qualified carers, which operates from a room alongside
the training room so that mothers can check on their babies when
they want to.
Another problem is accommodation. The teenage
pregnancy strategy makes provision for all lone parents under 18 to
have access to semi-independent accommodation with support by 2003.
There is some evidence that local authorities may be struggling to
meet that target in the spirit in which it was intended, but a
number of pilot schemes under the strategy have proved very
successful.
In terms of progress to date, the unit has
appointed a network of teenage pregnancy coordinators who are
responsible for co-ordinating and implementing the teenage
pregnancy strategy through local multi-agency groups. Each area has
agreed a reduction target for teenage pregnancies, with more
challenging targets for those with the biggest problem. A national
media campaign has been run with advertisements on local radio and
in young people's magazines, encouraging young people to take
control and make informed choices about their sex lives. A similar
campaign is about to be launched targeting parents who may feel
reluctant about talking to their children about sex. And teachers
and schools have received guidance on the importance of rigorous
sex and relationship education for both young men and women.
It is too early to tell whether all this
concerted effort may be starting to pay off, but the numbers of
teenage pregnancies were already beginning to fall. Between 1998
and 1999 the under-18 conception rate fell by 4 per cent, and the
under-16 rate fell by 7 per cent.6
But, significantly, the under-18 rate for the
first three quarters of 2000 is lower than for 1999, and shows a
clear downward trend over the past eight quarters. More
importantly, the proportion of teenage mothers in education or work
has increased from 16 per cent in 1997 to 29 per cent in 2001.
Perhaps the biggest hurdle in tackling teenage pregnancy will be
pulling off society's blindfold in relation to sex education and
contraceptive services for under-16s, and giving the most
disadvantaged young people something better to hope for.
- Contact the teenage pregnancy unit on 020
7972 5073.
1 Speech by public health
minister Yvette Cooper to the Institute for Public Policy Research,
21 January, 2002.
2 Social Exclusion Unit,
Report on Teenage Pregnancy, The Stationery Office,
1999
3 Independent Advisory
Group on Teenage Pregnancy, First Annual report, IAGTP
November 2001
4 Teenage Pregnancy
Unit, www.teenagepregnancyunit.gov.uk
5 Sure Start Plus,
http://www.surestart.gov.uk/home.cfm
6 National Strategy for
Neighbourhood Renewal, Action Update on Teenage Pregnancy
Work, Stationery Office, December 2001