News

Absence is not an alibi in child abuse

Posted: 01 November 2001 | Subscribe Online



Yvonne Roberts argues that Lauren Wright’s father has been too leniently treated by the judiciary absence is not an alibi in child abuse.

Lauren Wright died, aged six, malnourished and patterned with bruises. According to Judge David Mellor, in court last week, even without the fatal blow that caused the collapse of her digestive system , Lauren would have died from hunger and thirst, as certainly, “as if she had been cast out alone in the farthest desert.”

For two years, Lauren, had been, “isolated, scapegoated and humiliated” by her stepmother, Tracey Wright, resentful that she had to care for another woman’s child. At the same time, Lauren’s natural father, Craig, claimed: “I didn’t know what was going on....” The judge criticised Craig Wright for having “quite extraordinary self-centredness”.

Article continues below the advertisement

While Lauren had suffered, Craig Wright, 38, a mechanic, had been in the pub or fishing or: “Enhancing his reputation as a gentle giant or a general good bloke.”

As always when a child dies from cruelty, culpability is widespread. In Lauren’s case, social services, education and health authorities were remiss.

What is also depressingly familiar is the pattern of sentencing. Tracey Wright, the “wicked stepmother”, the archetypal subversion of the “good” mother, correctly received a 10-year sentence for manslaughter and five years to run consecutively for wilful neglect. In contrast, Craig Wright, a mechanic, sane of mind, equipped with average intelligence, who had shamefully abdicated his parental duty to protect and nurture, received only three years for manslaughter and three years for wilful negligence to run concurrently. In eighteen months he could be a free man.

Can this huge discrepancy - 15 years for the stepmother; three for the biological father - really be an example of justice being seen to be done? Why should damage to an idealised version of motherhood exact a far higher penalty than a gross failure to live up to the duties of fatherhood?

Article continues below the advertisement

John Smith, aged four, was also tortured to death. Last week, Simon and Michelle Williams, the couple who adopted him, were sentenced to eight years for child cruelty. It couldn’t be proven which of them had inflicted the injuries, so neither could be charged with manslaughter. James Sweeney, John Smith’s grandfather, who had tried desperately to win custody of his grandson, wants a change in the law to create a new offence of causing death through cruelty or neglect, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years.

It’s a measure which deserves to be supported. Even more so if it applies to a parent, most usually a father, who is sane, able and allegedly involved with his child, but who, as in the horrendous case of Lauren Wright, still reneges on his duty to rescue.



Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts