News

Multi-agency report criticises social services' criteria for intervention

Posted: 17 October 2002 | Subscribe Online


Children are being put at risk because the criteria for calling in social services to probe concerns are too limited, says a major new report.

Safeguarding Children, compiled by eight independent inspectorates including the Social Services Inspectorate, the Commission for Health Improvement and Ofsted, reveals disquiet among all agencies involved with children.

The agencies say the thresholds social services apply in their children's services are too high. They feel that social services are unable to provide "an adequate response" to situations which do not involve a high risk of serious harm to children and young people.

Article continues below the advertisement



Mike Leadbetter, outgoing president of the Association of Directors of Social Services, admitted that thresholds were too high. "In a world where we're fully staffed and where we're resourced properly we would want to intervene quicker," he said.

The report highlights how some agencies are reluctant to refer child welfare concerns to police and social services and others are not well integrated into local safeguarding arrangements.

The report recommends that social services should "review the thresholds" for providing services, for instigating child protection enquiries and for holding initial child protection conferences. Local agencies should be made aware of these thresholds.

In all the agencies, not enough priority was given to safeguarding in service planning or when allocating resources, the report finds, adding that recruitment and retention difficulties were hindering efforts.
Article continues below the advertisement



Lack of effective leadership and inconsistent support from other local agencies prevented many area child protection committees carrying out their responsibilities, the report adds.

The report recommends that government departments should:

  • Support agencies to recruit and retain enough qualified staff. Attention should be paid to the image, status, morale, remuneration and working conditions of specialist child protection staff.
  • Ensure that the safeguarding of children is reflected in national and local service planning.
  • Establish minimum expectations, standards and curriculum for child protection training as part of the core professional training of all professionals working with children and young people.
  • Consider whether ACPCs and multi-agency public protection panels should be put on a legal footing.


Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts