News

High Court judge's dismay at Haringey

Posted: 20 February 2003 | Subscribe Online


Haringey Council was under fire again last week after a High Court judge said she was "concerned and disappointed" about its failure to put in place procedures to ensure efficient management of child protection cases.

Mrs Justice Bracewell attacked the council for its handling of a case involving children aged two and three said to have suffered non-accidental injuries while in the care of their parents.

Sitting in the court's Family Division, she accused the council of a "singular lack of progress" in the case, adding that she had ordered the assistant director of social services David Derbyshire to court to explain.
Article continues below the advertisement



She said his evidence showed that he "not only had no knowledge of the case, but he had singularly failed to make any detailed inquiries and had relied on the social worker to give any explanation he could".

Cases in the Family Division are normally heard in private but the judge decided to make her comments public because of her concerns about Haringey. She said delay in such cases was detrimental to the children, adding that it was the duty of councils to take seriously "the task of protecting vulnerable children".
Article continues below the advertisement



The council said: "We regret the procedural delays which meant that some hearings could not take place as planned. However, this has not affected the date of the final hearing which is still due to take place in June. The children's safety has been maintained throughout with a package of support being provided for the family."

Haringey Council was seriously criticised during the Victoria Climbi' Inquiry and in the subsequent report for its failure to protect Victoria.


Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts