News

Test case on direct payment restraints

Posted: 27 February 2003 | Subscribe Online


A woman last week launched a test case at the High Court to allow her to use direct payments from her local authority to pay her husband to care for her.

Gillian Ely, who has multiple sclerosis, says Leeds Council's refusal to allow her to use the payments in this way violates her human rights.

But Nicholas O'Brien, representing Leeds, said the local authority was bound by the Community Care (Direct Payments) Regulations 1997, which forbids direct payments being authorised to secure services from a person's partner or close relative.
Article continues below the advertisement



A government consultation on the Community Care (Direct Payments) Act 1996, which closed at the end of last year, also states that the regulations prohibit direct payments to be made to a partner or a close relative living in the same household.

Mr Justice Toulson granted leave for a full judicial review hearing, although a date has yet to be set. If successful, other people who have been refused direct payments on similar grounds could also challenge their local authorities' decisions.


Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!




Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts