News

'Me and my shadow'

Posted: 23 October 2003 | Subscribe Online


Social work remains one of the most maligned of the caring professions. A Department of Health opinion survey of attitudes towards social workers in 2001 revealed that they were perceived as "politically correct dipsticks" or "geeky".1 In sections of the press they are also portrayed as "incompetent". US social workers who have come over here to see how the UK social care system works feel moved to write of how badly stressed, badly paid and badly educated their fellow professionals are.

Article continues below the advertisement



Yet while all this negative stuff keeps doing the rounds, thoughtful attempts to shift public perceptions of social services are not as well known. Several local authorities have pioneered imaginative schemes to change the way the service is delivered, the new social work degree that began last month will change and strengthen the intellectual basis of the profession and government ministers talk reflectively about how we need to adapt the welfare state to meet individual needs in a consumer-based economy.

Innovative shadowing schemes are also showing people, such as those celebrities involved in Community Care's recent Care in the Capital week, what social workers actually do. In one similar local scheme, a teenager who had been told by her school careers officer that she would probably make "a good dog-handler", became determined to be a social worker after spending a week shadowing a local professional. She was impressed and moved by the social worker's ability and determination to keep a 93-year-old woman living in her home, so keeping her sense of dignity intact.

It seems to me the problem with public perceptions of social workers is less to do with the job itself than with the deeply entrenched, morally fixed way in which society now sees itself. To invoke class or race distinction or even income inequality doesn't do justice to our social and moral landscape, a picture held to, often unthinkingly, by ordinary citizens, journalists and politicians operating in populist rather than philosophical mode.

As political thinking has become less about economic fairness and more about moral certitudes, so a kind of character-based apartheid has developed. On the one hand, apparently, there are all the "Good People", the majority who are striving to do well, get on in life and get on with everybody else. On the other, there are the "Pretty Bad" people who do manifestly bad things: scare us in the street, burgle people's homes, buy and sell drugs and make our schools and hospitals unpleasant places to be.

But get up close, and in most cases the simplicities of these mad, bad and dangerous-to-know labels start to dissolve. Out comes an individual or a family story that is much more complicated, much more intractable, much more touching than one could have guessed.
Article continues below the advertisement



Ordinary families sometimes fighting against extraordinary odds. Human beings in trouble. Given a chance or two, the right kind of resources, a steer in the right direction, their lives might have a chance to improve, a lot or just a little.

Interestingly, two leading Conservatives have recently encapsulated these radically opposing approaches to their fellow citizens. The Eton-educated shadow home secretary Oliver Letwin was caught at a Conservative Party conference fringe meeting admitting he would rather cut off one of his limbs than send his children to his local state school in Lambeth. He has since apologised to the school in question.

Meanwhile, Michael Portillo, the son of a Spanish socialist and one of the most enigmatic figures in British politics, was this month filmed looking after a family of four on £79 a week. Portillo emerged from his Merseyside income support experience admitting that "I had so little idea of this sort of life, managing on this sort of income, eating this sort of food. I really didn't have much understanding of how a whole swath of people were living their lives."

Bernard MacLaverty wrote in his 1997 novel, Grace Note: "Things are simple or complex according to how much attention is paid to them." Portillo's week spent with a family on income support, a kind of intense media version of shadowing, showed him just how complex the whole question of poverty and the related questions of crime and punishment really are.

If more people abandoned their cartoon-like attitudes and instead thought more deeply about the circumstances people find themselves in, then there just might be more public support for social work and more thoughtful people willing to enter the profession.

1 Department of Health, Public Perceptions of Social Work and Social Care, March 2001. Available from www.doh.gov.uk/scg/workforce/coifocusgrp.pdf

Melissa Benn is a journalist and novelist.



Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts