News

Charities and consumers' watchdog urge probe into care homes market

Posted: 11 December 2003 | Subscribe Online


The Consumers' Association and a coalition of 28 charities have complained to the Office of Fair Trading about the "dysfunctional" care home market.

Represented by the umbrella organisation Social Policy Ageing Information Network (Spain), they are urging further investigation into the sector.

After a detailed analysis, the Consumers' Association concluded that the care home market was "dysfunctional". In its submission to the OFT, two areas are highlighted: the often insufficient fees paid by public authorities to private companies and charities, and the expectation that local authority residents and their relatives will top up "inadequate" local authority fees.
Article continues below the advertisement



Insufficient council fees can also lead to private residents being charged more than local authority residents to make up the shortfall.

Les Bright, chairperson of Spain, said: "We all expect to exercise choice as to how we live our lives, but older people are routinely denied choice in the care home market. This is a major opportunity for the OFT to undertake a major investigation to make this market work."

The Consumers' Association and Spain also said there was a lack of accessible and reliable information on care homes.

Meanwhile, Age Concern Scotland has revealed that many older people are being disadvantaged by the system set up in 2001 to provide free personal and nursing care in Scotland.

The charity said many care homes were refusing to accept older people who had funding from the local authority for free care and were able to pay the cost of accommodation themselves but had asked the local authority to manage the contract on their behalf.
Article continues below the advertisement



If a care home accepted a self-funder under such an "integrated contract", it would be obliged to agree to the local authority-negotiated fee level used for council-funded residents.

But, as care homes could charge self-funders who arranged their own contract higher fees, they were less likely to accept those with "integrated contracts", the charity said.

The Scottish executive said little could be done as independent providers could not be forced to accept the "integrated contracts".


Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts