News

Behind the headlines

Posted: 26 February 2004 | Subscribe Online


Community care minister Stephen Ladyman announced earlier this month that "social worker" is to become a title protected by law. From April 2005 anyone practising without registering with the General Social Care Council could be fined up to £5,000. The move is part of a drive to raise the status of social care to match that of the medical and legal professions. But so far the workforce has been slow to embrace the changes and fewer than 5,000 of England's estimated 60,000 social workers have signed up to the register.   

Article continues below the advertisement

Martin Green, chief executive,Counsel and Care
"How social work is viewed by the public runs a lot deeper than the title and it is naive of Ladyman to think that by introducing a register he will elevate the status of social workers to that of doctors or lawyers. If he really wanted to do that, he would embark on a debate about the role and purpose of social work and have a proper education campaign to explain it to the public. Moreover, part of the high status of lawyers and doctors is directly linked to their incomes and increasing pay is one way to enhance credibility and attract and retain good staff."

Bob Hudson, professor of partnership studies, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham
"It would be churlish not to welcome these developments, and the prospect of a hefty fine should certainly increase registration levels. However, let's not get carried away with comparisons with doctors and lawyers, who have more control over professional entry and greater financial rewards than social work can ever expect to achieve. The key thing is the promotion of high professional standards. As a first step, social workers will have to accept greater responsibility for their own continuing professional development."

Julia Ross, social services director, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
"I strongly welcome the new 'protected' nature of the title of social work and the drive to achieve registration by 2005. I'm confident that we'll get there - we have to - we owe it to our public and service users! Probably like many of us, I needed a reminder, and the GSCC's 'Is Reg waiting for you?' advertisements certainly did that for me.

Article continues below the advertisement



Karen Squillino, children's services manager, Barnardo's
"I am all in favour of the professionalisation of social work, but protecting the title of 'social worker' would not help me feel that my status had been elevated. I would not want to achieve the status that is afforded to doctors and lawyers. I want the service users I work with to feel that they can develop a meaningful relationship with me so we can work collaboratively on effecting change. Sometimes having a title can prevent engagement as a 'them and us' situation develops."

Felicity Collier, chief executive, Baaf Adoption and Fostering
"It is absolutely right that there are clear criteria which must be met before you can call yourself 'social worker' - common qualifications, access to ongoing training and a shared value base. Think of the discredit to the profession caused by the 'independent social worker' who assessed the Kilshaws as suitable adopters when they tried to adopt twins through the internet. We need public confidence to do our work well and to attract high calibre new recruits."



Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts