Social services departments and area child protection committees
could be required to scrutinise thousands of licensing applications
a month when new licensing laws come into force next February,
social services directors have warned, writes Amy
Taylor.
Guidance accompanying the Licensing Act 2003 requires an ACPC or a social services department to look at all new license applications or applications for variations to existing licenses to assess whether children will be adequately protected from harm at the premises in question.
Peter Gilroy, director of social services at Kent Council, said that he found it “very difficult to accept that this should fall under social services” as, while the Act referred to the protection of children from harm, this was a “general duty not specific to child protection issues”.
He warned that Kent ACPC would be unable to complete the task, which the local licensing steering group anticipated would amount to 56,000 applications in the Kent area alone during the six months from February: “As the Kent Child Protection Committee concentrates on core business within existing time constraints, scrutinising licensing applications is an impossibility for us in terms of both time and resources.”
Gilroy added that his licensing authorities predicted the fees raised from charging for applications would barely cover the cost of their administration and would not be used to fund the ACPC or social services departments to scrutinise applications.
A spokesperson from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport stressed that applications for premises that were just converting their licences to bring them in line with the new laws would not need to be scrutinised.
He accepted, however, that although social services and ACPCs did not have a duty on them to put forward an opinion on each application, they would still need to look at each one in order to decide whether to do so or not.
The Association of Directors of Social Services is planning to make representations to the government about the additional workload the new laws represent.
Conduct: Jacinta Hofstetter says GSCC has pro-employer bias
GSCC conduct: Tricia Forbes wins Care Standards Tribunal appeal
LGA demand inquiry into credit ratings of Icelandic banks
GSCC case: Jacinta Hofstetter's practice slammed by ex-colleague
Details of government consultations
02 October 2008
Private Member Bills
25 July 2008
Government Legislation
25 July 2008