News

The Big Question

Posted: 18 November 2004 | Subscribe Online


Karen Shook

Disability equality adviser

I favour independent advocates. It's essential that service users faced with life decisions have the skills of someone who knows them and their situation. I am not convinced a consultee would be able to make decisions on their own. Perhaps there should be a choice of one or the other - or both.

Jean Stogdon

Carer and Grandparents Plus chair

If people are feeling weakened then they really want an advocate. Most people want someone who is on their side. Why else do people have lawyers? I strongly believe that people want advocates because otherwise it's not a level playing field. It's about strengthening people, isn't it? 

Article continues below the advertisement

Andy Doherty

Wheelchair user with learning difficulties

An advocate would be better for making sure a person's views are put forward. People can trust their advocate and the advocate knows them over a long time. They would help and give them confidence. Why do we need other people [independent consultees] putting their views forward?

Joan Scott

Article continues below the advertisement

Director of Action Unlimited

We have fought long and hard for advocates in the bill. Independent consultees only go half-way. Few people would be able to get one and their job would be different from an advocate. They have only done this to save money. Other people have a right to advocates so why can't people with learning difficulties?   



Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts