News

Campaigners Fathers Direct has welcomed a landmark case that saw an unemployed father win his seven-year fight to become eligible for child-care related benefits, writes Shirley Kumar.

Judges at an Appeal Court in December ruled in favour of Eugen Hockenjos who cared for his two daughters on an equal basis to his ex-wife. The move is likely could trigger a major re-write of the benefit rules.

Hockenjos of Islington, North London, can now claim thousands of pounds in back-payments, after the government consistently refused vital supplements to his Jobseeker’s Allowance worth about £60-a-month.

Lord Justice Scott Baker said Hockenjos was clearly a “substantial minority carer” for his children but the benefits system by its use of Child Benefit as a “passport” to other entitlements created an “all or nothing” situation, where the reality of shared care arrangements was not recognised.

Fathers Direct co-founder, Jack O’Sullivan welcomed the decision. He said the ruling could open the door to hundreds of other fathers “struggling financially to look after their children when they come to stay".

“The system simply treats the non-resident father as a single person and it should recognise that when parents separate, both become lone parents.”

The charity is holding a forum to discuss the benefit system at the Working with Fathers Conference sponsored by Community Care to be held on April 5 at the Institute of Education in London.

The government was refused permission to appeal further to the House of Lords, but may still petition the Law Lords for an appeal hearing.