News

The Simon Heng column

Posted: 06 January 2005 | Subscribe Online


The home secretary's plans to introduce a bill to outlaw incitement to religious hatred bring into focus the uncomfortable conundrum of liberal British social conscience: freedom of speech versus freedom from oppression.

Few things define what it is to be British in a positive way, but one is a developing acceptance of personal belief - political, social or religious - and the freedom to express those beliefs in public. Whether it be Enoch Powell predicting violent racial conflict, Bernie Grant celebrating violence against the police, or Salman Rushdie railing against Islam, one of the features of this society is allowing people to express these opinions, and let everyone else debate them.
Article continues below the advertisement



Another facet of Britishness is a growing acceptance of diversity, not only in religion, gender, sexuality, culture and ethnicity, but also - albeit recently - in disability. Oppression and discrimination in each of these areas have become better understood and less tolerated, to the point that implicit discrimination in government policy - towards asylum-seekers, for example - can be challenged vigorously, without censorship or imprisonment.

It seems to me that this second feature, acceptance of diversity and intolerance of oppression, is the point of the political correctness movement. That there is a link between the language we use and the attitudes we have towards someone or something is undeniable. That certain words have universally understood derogatory connotations, and that language can be used to discriminate and oppress, means that, to genuinely respect someone, I need to be conscious of the effect of my choice of words.
Article continues below the advertisement



But what if I don't respect someone's beliefs or practices? What if I think that someone's religion is oppressive in itself, or that their cultural practices are discriminatory? What if their core religious beliefs are fundamentally incompatible with my own? What if someone else's beliefs are actually contrary to the idea of diversity?

If we don't have the right to speak out against these, then we've lost the rights to both freedom from oppression and freedom of speech.


Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts