News

Delay to expert witness review adds to Meadow verdict worries

Posted: 21 July 2005 | Subscribe Online


An eagerly anticipated review of the role of expert witnesses in the family courts, ordered more than a year ago after the Angela Cannings judgment, is unlikely to be published until the end of the year, Community Care has learned.

The review was ordered in June 2004 by the then children's minister, Margaret Hodge, after concerns over evidence from paediatricians including Professor Sir Roy Meadow.

He was struck off the medical register last week after being found guilty of serious professional misconduct in a case where his evidence led to the conviction of another mother, Sally Clark, for killing her two babies.
Article continues below the advertisement



He had told a jury there was a one in 73 million chance of two cot deaths occurring in her family, but the General Medical Council ruled that his evidence was seriously misleading.

Although the Clark case was a criminal one, the adverse publicity surrounding Meadow has deterred paediatricians from acting as expert witnesses in the family courts. Practitioners had hoped the review, which is being conducted by the chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, would make recommendations about how to tackle this problem.

Family court insiders say the Meadow verdict will not help. Malcolm Richardson, chair of the Magistrates Association's family proceedings committee, said: "It's difficult to see how it can enhance the chances of doctors volunteering to do this work, whether in the family or the criminal courts."

However, a source told Community Care this week that publication of Sir Liam's report had been delayed by the general election and it would probably not go to ministers until September.
Article continues below the advertisement



Meanwhile, a new scheme that aims to improve investigations into child deaths is to be piloted from October in Wales, Northern Ireland, and the South West and North East of England.

Dr Harvey Marcovitch, spokesman for the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said he hoped the child death review teams would "stop the issue of experts arguing in court some years after the event about what a child might have died from".

Every death of a child aged up to 16 will be reported to the teams, which would "very thoroughly" investigate the cause of death, Marcovitch added.

The project is being run by the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health, which is managed by six organisations including the RCPCH and Royal College of Pathologists.


Spread the word:   bookmark it! diggit! reddit!



Products and Services
  • RSS Feeds
  • Conferences
  • Jobs By Email
  • News
  • Blogss
  • Videos
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • Podcasts