The reputation of social workers looks set to take another knock this week with claims that a small child was forcibly removed from his foster mother outside their home just two hours after a judge urged that the case be dealt with sensitively.
You can just predict the tabloid headlines slamming the "child snatchers" - a highly emotive phrase, of course, but it is easy to see why the media reach for such slogans when events unfold in this way.
Last month the foster carer lost her fight for guardianship of a boy she had cared for for more than 16 months. Although the judge recognised the emotional bond between the two, he approved the council's decision to place him for adoption. So far, so good, but why was it necessary for the social workers in this case to act so precipitately? The authority maintains that the staff behaved correctly but without evidence that the child was in imminent risk it is difficult to see how such action could have been in line with best practice.
LGA issues child protection warning about obese children
Conduct: Jacinta Hofstetter says GSCC has pro-employer bias
Details of government consultations
02 October 2008
Private Member Bills
25 July 2008
Government Legislation
25 July 2008