Specialist courts have sprung up across the country to deal with
domestic violence cases, young offenders, substance misusers and
people with mental health issues. But what evidence is there that
they actually work? Anabel Unity Sale reports
YOUTH COURTS
When were they set up?
Under the Criminal Court Act 1991 the juvenile court became the
youth court. This is a specialised form of magistrates' court where
all cases against defendants aged 10-17 are heard, unless it is a
homicide or rape case or the offence is so serious that the
sentencing powers of the youth court are insufficient.
How many are there and where are they?
Cases can be heard in any designated magistrates' court. There
are 360 magistrates' courts in England and Wales, although not all
have youth courts.
How much do they cost to run and who funds
them?
Her Majesty's Courts Service funded all 360 magistrates' courts
to the tune of £517m in 2006-7. Figures for exact youth court spend
are unavailable.
What was the rationale behind them?
Youth courts seek to maintain the welfare of the young defendant
and proceedings are held in a separate area from the adult court.
Their magistrates and staff undergo special training, and
procedures are less formal than in adult criminal courts. For
example, magistrates deliberately talk directly to defendants
rather than through their legal representative. Sentences are meant
to address the needs of young offenders. Youth courts can issue
sentences in the community lasting two years and impose detention
and training orders. Youth courts are not open to the public and
only those directly involved in the case will normally be in the
room. The press may attend and report the proceedings but will not
usually be allowed to publish the defendant's name.
Do they work?
A report by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Court Administration
in the spring noted the culture of youth courts had changed in the
previous five years and "young defendants are very much central to
the proceedings and the language and style of the court process has
changed to ensure this happens". Areas for improvement included
safety and security in many youth courts and risk assessment
procedures. It also recommended that pre-court information to
prepare young defendants and their parents or carers be available
and disseminated.
Bill Kerslake, head of effective sentencing at the Youth Justice
Board, agrees the youth court has improved. "The pledge to speed up
the system for persistent young offenders has been a result." He
adds that the YJB wants this to continue and for courts to have a
more individualised approach to young people, especially in terms
of sentencing. "We would like to see more case-holding district
judges or magistrates, who see the whole case from beginning to end
so there isn't the opportunity to go into court, have the case
heard and for a judge to reinterpret it in another way."
●
Thematic Inspection of Youth Courts:
Implementation of the Youth Court Good Practice Guide 2001,
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Court Administration, 2007
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURTS
How many are there?
Specialist domestic violence courts were established in April
2006 after research evaluating five models in Cardiff, Derby,
Leeds, London and Wolverhampton. There are now 64 in England, with
plans to expand into Wales.
What was the rationale for setting them up?
The number of prosecutions for domestic violence cases is low as
many victims are unwilling to report incidents to the police, let
alone go to court. A Crown Prosecution Service evaluation of how
magistrates' courts dealt with domestic violence cases was
published in March 2004. It concluded that no single model could be
suggested as a template but that a specialist approach to domestic
violence, including effective support for victims, delivered
benefits.
Do they work?
The evaluation found an increase in the number of guilty pleas
and convictions more domestic violence offences reported to the
police that resulted in prosecutions enhanced evidence-gathering to
allow prosecutions to continue if the victim retracts their
statement and a reduction in the number of cases lost before
trial.
Beryl Foster, operations director of Standing Together Against
Domestic Violence in Hammersmith which supports people attending
West London Magistrates' Court says: "Bringing together all the
expertise in one place and training the professionals involved in
how to handle domestic violence cases, and the difficulty of
prosecuting them, really helps the victim."
The courts give the message to perpetrators that domestic
violence will be taken seriously and dealt with accordingly by
police and magistrates, she adds.
Deborah McIlveen, national services development manager for
Women's Aid Federation of England, says the introduction of the
specialist courts has resulted in the recognition of advocacy and
support services for victims attending court. She says more
evidence is needed to show a successful increase in the safety of
victims of domestic violence after they have attended court. "We
want to see proper risk management put in place as we don't yet
know if having this court process makes women safer."
●
Evaluation of Specialist Domestic Violence
Courts/Fast Track Systems, Crown Prosecution Service,
2004
FAMILY DRUG AND ALCOHOL COURT
Background
A sole family drug and alcohol court is due to be piloted in
January 2008. The court will be based in the Inner London and City
Family Proceedings Court, Wells Street, London. This court deals
with cases from the London boroughs of Camden, Islington and
Westminster.
How much will it cost and who will fund it?
The pilot is being funded by Camden, Islington and Westminster
councils, the Department for Children, Schools and Families and Her
Majesty's Courts Services. The pilot's cost over three years is
£1.6m, £450,000 of which is coming from the DCSF, and £450,000 is
earmarked for research and evaluation. Although HMCS has
contributed to the pilot, running costs and further rollout costs
will be self-funding.
What is the rationale?
District judge Nicholas Crichton, based at the Inner London and
City Family Proceedings Court, proposed the idea for a family drug
and alcohol court after visiting similar courts in the US. A
feasibility study by Brunel University was undertaken on behalf of
the three local authorities in 2005.
The court will see specially trained magistrates and court staff
work alongside practitioners and social workers to deal with
families with drug and alcohol misuse issues involved in care
proceedings. The initiative aims to work with about 60 families -
20 from each local authority - a year in court. During the care
proceedings the focus will be on the therapy and recovery of the
parent in order to improve their long-term ability to care for
their child.
The model is based on a multi-disciplinary team engaging the
parent at the earliest stage and working with them for one year,
during which they will have treatment targets to achieve. If they
meet their goals they will "graduate" from the programme. If not
the care proceedings case will return to the normal court
system.
Will it work?
Sally Heath, commissioning manager for Camden Council's
children, schools and families department and lead on the pilot,
says such an approach is needed. She points out that 60-70% of all
care proceedings cases in the pilot's local authorities involve
substance misuse. She says offering these parents suitable
assessments, support and care packages will help families to
address their problems and avoid further legal intervention. "We
want the court to encourage the whole family to stay in treatment
and keep on track. If there has been a relapse we want the family
to take advantage of the level of support and intervention services
offered to them."
MENTAL HEALTH COURTS
When were they proposed and when could they become a
reality?
Mental health courts are already used in the US, Australia and
Canada and - if government proposals in its criminal justice
strategy go ahead - could also be introduced here. A spokesperson
for Her Majesty's Courts Service says the proposal is being
explored and the body is drafting an internal document to identify
options and costs.
What is the rationale?
Mental health courts ensure that offenders with mental health
needs are assessed and treated in a non-custodial setting.
Could they work?
The idea has been are welcomed by Sean Duggan, director of
prisons and criminal justice at the Sainsbury Centre for Mental
Health. He supports diverting people from the criminal justice
system into mental health services. Says Duggan: "If a mental
health court pools resources from criminal justice, health and
social care locally and has proper leadership, management,
protocols and assessment, it could be a good start."
The charity has appointed a researcher to look at this issue
over the coming year and review evidence from abroad.
If these courts do go ahead it is critical to involve the third
sector, says Mind's policy director, Sophie Corlett. "If it's about
making the criminal justice system more human then it's a good
idea, but if it's about sharing with the sector the punitive parts
of the criminal justice system we are not interested. If we are
already involved with the people seen in a court then it may
undermine some of the positive work we are doing."
●
Building on Progress: Security, Crime and
Justice, Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, March 2007
| Case Study: Jade Saunders
18-year-old ex-offender |
|---|
'Youth courts are too soft on young offenders' If former young offender Jade Saunders
(pictured) had appeared in a crown court - not a youth court - the
first time she offended (possession of an offensive weapon and
robbery), she says she would not have ended up with two more court
hearings, including committal to crown court. "If I'd have gone to
a crown court first I wouldn't have reoffended at all because they
are so scary and horrible. Being in a crown court really shook me
up."
Saunders initially went to a youth court in April 2005. Friends
who had already been to a youth court told her the judges were
"nasty" and initially she was worried. "I've been to three youth
courts and they aren't that bad the crown court was harsh and
intimidating." Saunders does not believe young people should receive different
treatment from adults who commit offences and thinks youth courts
are too soft. "It doesn't matter what age you are, you should be
treated the same if you commit a crime. When most of the people I
know go to youth courts nothing happens to them, they get a second
chance or are electronically tagged. Sentences need to be
stricter." |
| Case Study: Lianne A victim of
domestic violence |
|---|
Testifying behind screen helped to secure
conviction Lianne* first experienced domestic violence from her partner
Doug*, who misused drugs, while she was pregnant with their child.
He already had a conviction for assault and harassment of a
previous partner. When their baby was three months old, Doug assaulted her. She
reported the offence to Hammersmith and Fulham police who referred
her to the charity Advocacy and Non Violence Community Education
(Advance) for support while she took her case to the West London
Specialist Domestic Violence Court, based at West London
Magistrates' Court. With the help of an advocate from Advance, she visited the
domestic violence court beforehand and met the police and Crown
Prosecution Service to ask for special measures as she was
concerned about testifying against her former partner. It was
agreed that screens could be placed in the courtroom to shield her
and the advocate attended the hearing with her. Doug changed his plea to guilty when he knew Lianne was going to
give evidence against him. The advocate also liaised with Lianne
and other professionals once the case was adjourned for
pre-sentence reports. Doug was sentenced to three months in
prison. *Names have been changed |
Contact the author
Anabel Unity
Sale
A young offender says youth courts are too soft. Is she
right? E-mail to
comcare.letters@rbi.co.uk
This article appeared in the 6 September issue under the
headline "The jury's out"