National dementia strategy must have timetable for implementation

Maria Ahmed
Friday 25 January 2008 12:09

MPs have slammed the NHS for failing to prioritise dementia services, leaving thousands of sufferers without adequate care.

A Commons' public accounts committee report said yesterday that many people did not receive a formal diagnosis and public and professionals believed that "little could be done" to help people.

Little improvement
"The Department [of Health] has not given dementia the same priority status as cancer and coronary heart disease. As a result the NHS has not afforded dementia the same focus for improvement," the report Improving Services and Support for People with Dementia said.

The committee's inquiry, based on evidence from the Department of Health and the NHS, found that carers of dementia sufferers bore a "heavy burden," saving the taxpayer millions of pounds.

It also found that a lack of dementia beds and trained staff led to poor management of medication and inadequate care.

Increase
The report cited figures showing that the number of people with dementia was set to increase by over 30% over the next 15 years. There are currently about 560,000 with the condition in England.

The committee called for a forthcoming national dementic strategy currently being developed by the government to have a "clear timetable" for implementation and to include measures to address underperforming services.

Further information

Improving Services and Support for People with Dementia 

Related articles

The National Dementia Strategy cannot be allowed to fail, writes Neil Hunt

Dementia care “inconsistent and unsustainable,” National Audit Office report warns

Essential information on older people

Contact the author

Maria Ahmed

 


 

What do you think? Have your say on CareSpace.

Keep up to date with the latest developments in social care by signing up to our daily and weekly newsletters.

Social care link
paperwork

Liberating adult social work

How do you free practitioners from bureaucracy, rationing and risk aversion, asks Mithran Samuel