A landmark Supreme Court ruling today has paved the way for families facing deportation to remain in the UK if it is in the best interests of their children.
In the case of ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC4, the Supreme Court allowed a Tanzanian woman who was threatened with deportation to remain in the UK because removing her would breach the Article 8 human rights of her two children - the right to private and family life.
This was despite her chequered immigration history, which included two asylum claims under a false name. The decision will mean that courts must consider the best interests of children in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation.
Syd Bolton and Baljeet Sandhu, co-directors of the Refugee Children's Rights Project, said the decision marked a "significant step forward". In a joint statement they said: "The court has now set in stone the need to recognise the rights of the child and has sought to address the injustice done to children when immigration control is put before their welfare and needs."
They said the ruling highlighted the vulnerability of children in the immigration system, who will be denied access to justice, they claimed, under the government's proposals to cut legal aid funding. "If these proposals come to fruition an important case such as this may have never reached the court's doors," they stated
They called for the courts, the UK Border Agency and the Legal Services Commission to put in place "child-sensitive procedures to ensure that this judgment is given full effect in their duties to safeguard children, and that in all decisions about children and their families, their best interests should customarily dictate the outcome".
Picture credit: Rex Features