By Rod Morgan (former Youth Justice Board chair)There is huge uncertainty and gloom among youth justice workers at present. The axing of the Youth Justice Board (YJB) and significant budget cuts are combining with a bleak outlook for young people as the number of unemployed 16-24 year olds approaches one million.
But I would argue that scaling back criminal justice agencies combined with a lack of money for criminal justice intervention could be very positive in the long run.
Labour's recordThe Labour Government 'governed through crime'. Despite many positive policies, it was 'tough on crime' and not 'the causes of crime' as it claimed.
Their punitive policies were particularly targeted at children. They removed all doubt about the criminal responsibility of 10-13 year-olds by sweeping away the doli incapax presumption.
They pressurised reluctant local authorities into using ASBOs against the young. They incentivised the criminalising of young people by setting targets for 'offences brought to justice'. The number of children criminalised and incarcerated soared.
This is despite all the research evidence that shows the likelihood of re-offending is increased rather than decreased by such actions, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the enormous cost implications.
Big SocietyIf the Big Society is to mean anything it should mean getting away from governing through crime. This is one sphere where we genuinely need a smaller state; where the outcome of social order will be better achieved by non-criminal controls such as the family, the neighbourhood and the school.
Where decision-making and budgetary allocations are best devolved to local authorities and discretion restored to professionals such as social workers and police officers.
The transition is going to be painful and the risks are considerable.
Nine months ago the Independent Commission on youth justice, published
Time for a Fresh Start outlining just such a direction of travel. It is not without its critics (see the recent
Journal of Children's Services which I guest edited) but there is general agreement that it lays down a sensible way forward. Following the government's recent Legal Aid and Sentencing Bill it appears ministers are taking the recommendations seriously.
The trick which must now be pulled is to ensure that some of the savings resulting from reduced numbers of children in custody or appearing before the courts are returned, not to the Treasury to reduce the national deficit, but to local authority children's services and the voluntary sector.
Rod Morgan is Professor Emeritus at the University of Bristol and former chair of the YJB. He also edited the most recent edition of the Journal of Children's Services (June 2011) which draws together commentaries on youth justice and Time for a Fresh Start.
(picture: Rex Features)
What do you think? Join the debate on CareSpace Keep up to date with the latest developments in social care Sign up to our daily and weekly emails Also read:
Young offenders on remand to be given looked-after statusFor Inform subscribers:
Guide to jointly delivering services: Youth offending teams and children's social care