<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>The Child Minder</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2008:/blogs/childrens-services//9</id>
   <updated>2008-01-10T13:06:12Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Examining the policies, decisions and events affecting the lives of the UK’s most vulnerable children</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 1.53</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Same needs, different service</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2008/01/same-needs-different-service.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2008:/blogs/childrens-services//9.21617</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-10T11:40:47Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-10T13:06:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Amy Taylor On a recent trip to a council in the West of England I was struck by the difference in the level of services offered to young people in need who become homeless at the ages of 16...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Amy Taylor</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Care leavers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="5143" label="care leavers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2656" label="council" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="37227" label="homeless" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="37228" label="hostel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[By Amy Taylor

On a recent trip to a council in the West of England I was struck by the difference in the level of services offered to <a href="http://www.centrepoint.org.uk">young people in need who become homeless at the ages of 16 or 17 </a>and those <a href="http://www.careleavers.com">leaving care</a>. While both groups often seemed to have similar problems, a need for accommodation, an increased likelihood to have mental health problems and drug and alcohol problems and low educational attainment, the services available to care leavers and what they are entitled to is far superior.]]>
      At this particular authority while care leavers were sent to live in a small, bright, smartly furnished house with a cared for garden and live in worker, for all intents and purposes no different to many swish homes across the country, young people who became homeless at 16 were packed off to a rambling run down hostel nearby.  

Along with its 16 and 17 year old residents the hostel was also home to homeless single adults, homeless families and adult offenders, although not those classifed as schedule one. A security guard and CCTV were present and I was told  the police were frequent visitors. While clean the facilities were basic and dated.

Going to stay here as an adult or with your parents would be daunting enough but as a 16 or 17 year old unable to live with your family it would be completely daunting. Although only used for the group for short periods of time, while other more suitable accommodation is sought, it would leave an ever lasting impression.

Nobody would want to deny care leavers the service they get, and I am fully aware that in many other authorities the acccommodation on offer in not of as of high quality, but it is not right that two groups, with such similar needs, are treated so differently just due to the age they came into the system.
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The end of the Childminder</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/the-end-of-the-childminder.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17574</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-15T10:28:04Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-15T10:30:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There will be no more posts on The Childminder for the time being as we have a shiny new blog where you can find all the latest news and views on children&apos;s issues and social care - The Social Work...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="31204" label="social work blog" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[There will be no more posts on The Childminder for the time being as we have a shiny new blog where you can find all the latest news and views on children's issues and social care - <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/social-work-blog/">The Social Work Blog</a>. See you there!]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Jonathan Ross insults children in care</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/jonathan-ross-insults-children.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17346</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-12T16:03:43Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-12T16:18:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>by Lauren Revans Normally I quite like Jonathan Ross – even if he is vastly overpaid. But on Friday night, he definitely overstepped the mark....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Children in care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="1590" label="children in care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="30812" label="Jimmy Carr" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="30810" label="Jonathan Ross" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left;margin: 0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Lauren Revans" title="Lauren Revans" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/Lauren-Revans-small.jpg" width="60" height="60">by Lauren Revans

Normally I quite like Jonathan Ross – even if he is vastly overpaid. But on Friday night, he definitely overstepped the mark.
]]>
      In the interests of ‘comedy’, Ross told stand-up Jimmy Carr that he “had the look of someone who had been in care”, adding that, if he came across him in a restaurant when he was out with his family, he would keep his children away.

Maybe I was feeling a bit sensitive having recently visited and talked with some children in care, but I’m afraid I couldn’t find anything about this particular interaction to laugh about.

As far as I am concerned:

Implying that people who have been in care are somehow all strange looking is not funny; 
and implying that people who have been in care are potentially dangerous to children is not funny. 
 
There are many other ways Ross could have chosen to laugh with/at someone like Jimmy Carr. Choosing to offend some of society’s most disadvantaged children in the process was, at best, unnecessary and, at worst, down right offensive.



   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>This weeks feature articles</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/this-weeks-feature-articles.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17112</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-07T17:26:37Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T17:31:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In Community Care this week, there are two featured articles relating to the childrens sector. Firstly we have &quot;Stitching a deal together&quot; - read Mark Hunter&apos;s report on the Midlands experience of cross region collaboration Secondly read &quot;Measures of future...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="30298" label="Featured articles" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[In Community Care this week, there are two featured articles relating to the childrens sector.

Firstly we have "<a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/11/07/106379/joint-commissioning-among-midlands-councils.html">Stitching a deal together</a>" - read Mark Hunter's report on the Midlands experience of cross region collaboration

Secondly read "<a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/11/07/106374/children-and-young-people-indicators-and-targets-in-the-wake-of-the-comprehensive-spending-review.html">Measures of future success</a>" - an investigation, written by Lauren Revans, Natalie Valios and Anabel Unity Sale, into how government social spending plans will affect children and families]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>TV and violence</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/tv-and-violence.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17082</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-07T12:30:23Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T12:38:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Watching TV is bad for you - I knew it all along! According to the latest research, reported in Medical News Today watching violent telly between the ages of 2 and 5 is linked to aggressive and anti-social behaviour in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Child health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="simeon%2060.jpg" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/simeon%2060.jpg" width="60" height="60" />Watching TV is bad for you - I knew it all along! According to the latest research, <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/87763.php">reported</a> in Medical News Today watching violent telly between the ages of 2 and 5 is linked to aggressive and anti-social behaviour in boys when they reach the age of 7.]]>
      Now, I&apos;m no Mary Whitehouse, but film and TV is way more violent than it used to be and we&apos;ve not even started on computer games. People have said for ages that it&apos;s all fine and it has no effect on people but perhaps now we will begin to realise that it does.
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Family statistics</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/family-statistics.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17071</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-07T11:25:57Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T11:31:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary> by Adam McCulloch Interesting new figures from the Office for National Statistics on British families reported on the BBC, and the Office of National Statistics....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Family" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="2222" label="alcohol" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4722" label="drugs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6087" label="family" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13316" label="gender pay gap" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12791" label="statistics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin:0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Adam McCulloch" title="Adam McCulloch" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=5671" width="60" height="60" /> by Adam McCulloch

Interesting new figures from the Office for National Statistics on British families <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7071611.stm">reported on the BBC</a>,  and <a href="http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=284">the Office of National Statistics</a>.
 
]]>
      <![CDATA[Good to see that family spending on alcohol and narcotics (!) is less than £20 per week.

Also interesting to see in another <a href="http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=167">stat report</a> that the gender pay gap is the narrowest since records began ]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The shape of disputes to come</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/the-shape-of-dispute-to-come.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17068</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-07T11:01:05Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-07T11:14:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Local government unions may have settled for 2.5% this time around but they are already on collision course for a clash with employers on coming years. Check out Mithran Samuel&apos;s article from this weeks issue...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gary</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Children&apos;s workforce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10920" label="local government" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2407" label="pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="392" label="unison" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="30200" label="workforce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[Local government unions may have settled for 2.5% this time around but they are already on collision course for a clash with employers on coming years.

Check out <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/11/07/106367/local-government-pay-and-industrial-action-unison-settles-but-theres-trouble-in-store.html">Mithran Samuel's article</a> from this weeks issue]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Queen&apos;s speech update</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/queens-speech-update.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.17020</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-06T14:46:02Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-06T14:49:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Queen&apos;s Speech has announced a new Children and Young Person&apos;s Bill. &quot;A Children and Young Persons Bill reiterated the pledges of the Care Matters white paper and will give local authorities piloting GP-style social work practices the power to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="30008" label="children and young persons bill" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="30006" label="Queen&apos;s Speech" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[The Queen's Speech has announced a new Children and Young Person's Bill. 

<em>"A Children and Young Persons Bill reiterated the pledges of the Care Matters white paper and will give local authorities piloting GP-style social work practices the power to test the model. The bill also recapped on other white paper measures including placing the role of designated teacher on a statutory footing and ensuring children in care did not move schools in Year 10 and 11 except in exceptional circumstances."</em>

Read the <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/11/06/106356/queens-speech-looked-after-children-and-adult-care-reforms.html">whole story</a> on it on the Community Care news site.

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Is it ever acceptable to take away the life of an unborn child because it might be disabled?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/is-it-ever-acceptable-to-take.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.16839</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-02T12:15:37Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-02T16:33:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>by Maria Ahmed The question was raised this week as the parliamentary science and technology committee published its report on scientific developments relating to the Abortion Act 1967....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Disabilities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="11306" label="abortion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17980" label="disability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="906" label="disabled children" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="29681" label="parliamentary science and technology committee" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin 0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Maria Ahmed" title="Maria Ahmed"src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/Maria-Ahmed-60.jpg" width="60" height="60" />by Maria Ahmed

The question was raised this week as the parliamentary science and technology committee published its <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmsctech/1045/1045i.pdf">report on scientific developments</a> relating to the Abortion Act 1967.]]>
      <![CDATA[As part of its inquiry, it examined ground E of the act which says abortion can be considered where there is “substantial risk” that if a child were born it would suffer from physical or mental abnormalities making it “seriously handicapped.”

There are “inconsistencies” on the way abnormalities are defined, leading to unborn children with minor disabilities being aborted, the committee found.

Just two doctors can currently assess whether an unborn child would suffer severe abnormality, leading to an “unacceptable risk of subjective decision-making,” David Randall, a final year medical student, argued in his evidence to the committee.

The consequences have been highly controversial, as outlined in the committee’s report.

In 2001, a 28-week foetus was aborted because it was diagnosed with a bilateral cleft lip and palate. Joanne Jepson, a trainee curate, asked the police to investigate but the Crown Prosecution Service refused to prosecute, arguing that the doctors had acted in good faith.

This decision was made despite previous outrage caused by two lawyers who sent a letter to all MPs arguing that a healthy foetus at greater than 24 weeks’ gestation could be legally aborted for having a hare lip or cleft palate.

The letter was sent during the government’s 1990 review of the Abortion Act, causing David Steel MP to describe it as a “gross calumny on the medical profession”.

There were 20 abortions for foetuses with clubbed feet from 1996 to 2006, and around half of foetuses affected by Down’s syndrome are aborted.

Randall gave compelling evidence against such terminations. Clubbed feet can always be successfully cured, he argued, pointing out that the winner of the 1992 Olympic gold medal for women’s figure skating was born with the condition.

Other terminations have been carried out for minor abnormalities including webbed fingers and extra digits, the committee heard.

In response to its findings, the science and technology committee has called on MPs to consider whether a clarification or definition of “seriously handicapped” is needed.

It has also recommended that the Department of Health should produce guidance for doctors and patients, and that data should be collected on the reasons for abortion beyond 24 weeks for foetal abnormality.

But has it gone far enough to protect the rights of children who would be born disabled? 

Anti-abortion organisations including the <a href="http://www.lawcf.org/ ">Lawyer’s Christian Fellowship</a> told the committee they did not accept that foetal abnormality “can ever justify abortion.”

It said: “The mere existence of this clause of the Act is highly controversial because of the way it discriminates unashamedly against the disabled and makes sweeping assumptions about the quality of life and of the intrinsic value of life.”

The <a href="http://www.spuc.org.uk/">Society for the Protection of Unborn Children</a>  which also gave evidence, has also spoken out against abortion of the disabled, saying it is “not only an attack on the most vulnerable and most in need of protection, but also an affront to all members of the community who are disabled. It sends them the message that they are inferior to, and of less value than, the able-bodied.”

But while the anti-abortion lobby seemingly spoke out on behalf of disabled children and their parents, views from the grassroots were surprisingly absent. 

Those giving evidence to the committee were largely divided between doctors and anti-abortion lobbyists.

There was vital but far too patchy evidence on medical advances that mean disabled children now stand a better chance of having equality and quality of life than before. This made something of a mockery of the inquiry’s purpose to look at “scientific developments” since the Abortion Act was passed in 1967.

The Lejeune Clinic for Children with Down’s Syndrome was the sole disability organisation that gave evidence, but where were the voices of the countless other disability groups? 

The abortion debate is too dominated by doctors, the women’s lobby and the anti-abortionists. The voices of disabled children and their parents must be heard to create a better future for the next generation.

<u>
More information</u> 

Read <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/SDAevidence.pdf">the evidence</a> submitted to the committee.

Also, there are a couple of interesting Community Care articles on this issue:
<a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2006/06/29/54752/is-it-right-to-screen-embryos-for-disabilities.html">Is it right to screen embryos for disabilities? </a>
<a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2003/12/11/43188/a-womans-right-to-decide-is-paramount.html">A woman’s right to decide is paramount [Jepson case]</a>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>When should children be protected from religion?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/11/when-should-children-be-protec.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.16767</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-01T11:34:06Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-01T11:50:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary> by Adam McCulloch Throw religion into the child protection pot and things become very complicated....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Child protection" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="1880" label="child protection" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="29457" label="louis theroux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3202" label="religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26613" label="richard dawkins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin:0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Adam McCulloch" title="Adam McCulloch" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=5671" width="60" height="60" /> by Adam McCulloch

Throw religion into the child protection pot and things become very complicated. ]]>
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/11/01/106332/escape-from-the-citadel-of-god.html">Community Care’s legal expert Ed Mitchell tells the story of a court case from 1993 in France: </a>

<em>"Mr Schmidt is a French national. He and his wife were members of “The Citadel”, an evangelical church. In 1993, their daughter, aged three, was placed in care in France. This was authorised by a French children’s judge who found that Citadel children were cut off from the “Satanic” outside world, obliged to observe frequent fasts, had limits placed on their sleep and, as punishment, were slapped and hit with belts. The judge concluded that, if the child remained with her parents, her “psychological balance and development was likely to be seriously compromised”. For this reason, the judge authorised the child’s removal."</em>

When reading this I was immediately reminded of the children of the Westboro Baptist Church in the US, the focus of a <a href="http://www.louis-theroux.co.uk/index.php/LouisTheroux/TheMostHatedFamilyInAmerica">Louis Theroux TV show. </a>

These children were subjected to hate and maybe psychological harm through their association with the church – their parents took them on pickets of funerals. They too were ‘cut off from the Satanic outside world’ although there is no suggestion they were physically harmed or abused by church members.

And what about the fringes around established religion here in the UK? Christianity, Islam, Hinduism … there could be extremists bringing up children and ‘educating’ them everywhere. How would we know when children are being harmed? 

By the way, my recommended reading for now is The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Youth Peer Panels remind me of Orwell’s 1984</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/10/youth-peer-panels-remind-me-of.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.16355</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-24T09:28:35Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-24T09:36:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I had flashbacks yesterday to the world created in George Orwell’s book, 1984, when I heard about the Ministry of Justice’s plan to pilot Peer Justice Centres, run by and for children, in England....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Caroline Lovell</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Youth justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="28537" label="Peer Panels" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="28539" label="Restorative Justice Centre" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="28535" label="Youth Justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin:0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Caroline Lovell" title="Caroline Lovell" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/adult-social-work/caroline lovell.jpg" width="60" height="60" />I had flashbacks yesterday to the world created in George Orwell’s book, 1984, when I heard about the Ministry of Justice’s plan to pilot Peer Justice Centres, run by and for children, in England.]]>
      Not dissimilar to the power given to the child Spies and Youth Lead in Orwell’s Oceania, who informed on their peers and parents over thought crimes, this wacky idea will see children, as young as ten, sitting on a panel to pass legal judgement over other children.

Plucked from the heartland of craziness, also known as the United States of America, the justice secretary, Jack Straw, has invested nearly £500,000 into three pilot projects in Preston, which could go nationwide if it is a success.

In place of magistrate courts, offenders aged under-17, who have admitted their guilt for a minor offence or anti-social behaviour, will face a panel of four children under minimal adult supervision.

Run by the local authority and the crime reduction charity, NACRO, children from local schools will be trained up to issue Acceptable Behaviour Contracts when they sit on the peer panels.

If the offender does not abide by the ABC, which could force them to clean up graffiti or apologise to the victim, the child will be referred to the police.

The most alarming part of this whole pilot project for me is the level of power passed to children.  I don’t think kids have the maturity, experience, or balance to pass such important judgements over their peers.  

If you look at the politics that collide in school playgrounds, you quickly see that children are fickle creatures, who are easily influenced by their peers and subject to intimidation and bullying.  This shouldn’t transfer into the court room.
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The human casualties of home closures</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/10/the-human-casualties-of-home-c.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.15672</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-10T14:45:06Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-10T14:56:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I am having a crisis of faith. I thought every child was supposed to matter. Yet just this week, I came across a 12-year-old boy whose story suggests otherwise....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Lauren</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Children in care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7171" label="children&apos;s homes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="27207" label="placement stability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left;margin: 0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Lauren Revans" title="Lauren Revans" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/Lauren-Revans-small.jpg" width="60" height="60">I am having a crisis of faith. I thought <em>every</em> child was supposed to matter. Yet just this week, I came across a 12-year-old boy whose story suggests otherwise.]]>
      <![CDATA[Picture this: you leave home to go to school one Friday morning, the school bell goes at the end of the day and you are collected, but instead of returning to the home you left that morning you are taken to a new home. <em>Your</em> new home.

That’s it. No warning; no chance to pack your stuff up; no chance to say goodbye to the other boy that was living there with you; no chance to say goodbye or thank you to the staff who have been working with you and caring for you.

How can this happen? The government goes on and on about the importance of placement stability and continuity of care. The draft national contract for children and young people in residential care says that providers should give local authorities no less than three months’ notice of a home closure. Yet here we have an example of a clear lack of planning on one side or the other of a placement arrangement that has resulted in a vulnerable child being forced to deal with yet more sudden upheaval. Whatever the reason, it cannot be good enough.

Fortunately, this boy has landed in a good home that has already pledged to maintain his previous school placement so as to offer him at least some of that much talked about stability. But he did not arrive with all his medical notes, and his sudden arrival has impacted on the other young residents in his new home who had no time to prepare either.

Faced with new surroundings and new faces, this young man displays an amazing capacity for resilience. Sadly, though, I suspect this is not a positive characteristic he was born with, but more a coping mechanism he has developed as a result of being rejected and let down time and again.

An experience like this will do nothing to make this 12-year-old believe that he really matters. Nothing like this must ever be allowed to happen again.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Hats off to Staffordshire</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/10/hats-off-to-staffordshire.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.15601</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-09T15:51:41Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-09T15:58:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Clare Jerrom Thank god Staffordshire Council are investigating child protection concerns at Werrington Young Offender Institution ....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Youth justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin:0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Clare Jerrom" title="Clare Jerrom" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=3697" width="60" height="60" />By Clare Jerrom

Thank god Staffordshire Council are <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/10/09/106050/staffordshire-council-to-probe-child-protection-concerns-at.html ">investigating child protection concerns at Werrington Young Offender Institution </a>.]]>
      <![CDATA[Apparently in two cases, boys were “distressed” when they had their clothes cut from them while being restrained. Well there’s a surprise! I think I’d be pretty distressed if I was having my clothes cut from me at the best of times, let alone if I was being restrained so obviously at a time when I was already feeling alarmed or irate about something.

This treatment of children in our penal system is absolutely disgraceful. They are children and if two children were fighting on a street and I went up to one of them, held them back from the fight and cut their clothes off, no doubt I’d be escorted to the local police station and rightly so. Why does Werrington think this practice is acceptable because it’s in prison? I would imagine because it’s behind locked doors and they think these incidents will remain hidden. But thanks to the chief inspector of prisons, horrendous practices like these are being outed.

I used to specialise in the area of youth justice when reporting for Community Care and communitycare.co.uk and some of the practices I was told about shocked me to the core. I learned about <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2003/12/08/100543/exclusive-children-stripped-naked-and-kept-in-dark-cells.html?key=SPECIAL%20AND%20CELLS%20AND%20STOKE%20AND%20HEATH">special cells where disruptive children would be placed to “calm down”. </a>

Shortly after my piece was published I was contacted by the Home Office press office who were horrified that I could write such rubbish <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2004/01/12/43372/children-kept-in-special-cells-more-than-150-times.html?key=SPECIAL%20AND%20CELLS%20AND%20STOKE%20AND%20HEATH ">but just a month later the Home Office revealed in a parliamentary question </a>that these cells didn’t just exist in Stoke Heath as they’d admitted, but actually in 13 youth establishments and had been used more than 150 times in one year.

The thought of being placed in a small room wearing nothing but a garment similar to a horse blanket, with no toilet, food, poor light etc would hardly “calm me down”. I think it would distress and frighten me and probably make me very angry.

This wasn’t the only thing I discovered. Children were routinely strip searched and restrained in prison and driven from court to establishments in appalling conditions. In <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2004/07/15/45548/campaigners-and-inspectors-unite-over-transportation-of.html ">the escort vans they would be put in cages with no seat belts </a>and forced to endure long journeys with no breaks for the toilet or food. If they needed to urinate, they had to do so in the van cell and were then expected to clean it out on arrival at prison.

So when I heard that Staffordshire Council was going to investigate these claims, I was more than pleased. In my opinion, too many practices that would be deemed completely alarming outside the prison gate are somehow accepted within the prison walls. Yes, some of these children will have committed crimes and will be serving their time. But treating them like animals is hardly likely to incentivise them to be a model citizen in future – if anything it will make them hate the system even more and make them all the more determined to do a better job at not being caught next time.

And then some of these children are on remand and haven’t been found guilty yet – yet they are still subjected to these inhumane conditions.

I take my hat off to Staffordshire Council and hope other councils follow suit when they are alerted to similar concerns by the good work Anne Owers are her team carry out. ]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Kids are getting fatter - I wonder why?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/10/kids-are-getting-fatter-i-wond.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.15278</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-03T13:38:47Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-03T13:43:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Clare Jerrom Obesity levels among children are rising. Children are getting fatter. And I have to say that I’m not surprised as I make my daily trip to work surrounded by school children....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Child health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="26469" label="Child health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3542" label="Jamie Oliver" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7049" label="nutrition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1929" label="obesity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2553" label="school meals" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin:0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Clare Jerrom" title="Clare Jerrom" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=3697" width="60" height="60" />By Clare Jerrom

<a href="http:http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditions/obesity2.shtml">Obesity levels among children are risin</a>g. Children are getting fatter. And I have to say that I’m not surprised as I make my daily trip to work surrounded by school children.]]>
      <![CDATA[They are eating delights from McDonald’s breakfast menu such as Sausage and Egg McMuffins like they are going out of fashion. Some don’t even bother with the breakfast menu and tuck into a hardcore burger – or double burger: the Big Mac. Cans of pop are being opened left right and centre. Some kids have their hands delving into packets of crisps or eating chocolate bars at an alarming rate. And then there is the daily saga of whether they get off the bus a stop early to go “twos” on a cigarette or go to the shop to buy yet more rubbish in the form of sweets, chocolate, crisps. And this is at 8am!

Never having been one to appreciate breakfast myself, I tend to skip breakfast and have a mid morning sandwich instead. And because of this habit, I’ve been subject to many lectures in the past about how breakfast is the most important meal of the day, how you need porridge which releases energy throughout the morning and keeps you full til lunchtime, how I should at least have something warm before I leave the house on a cold winter’s morning. So I know all too well the importance of starting the day well. But these kids are something else.

Not only do I question where the money comes from to fund this habit – I mean it’s not some leafy London suburb, it’s a town on the edge of London with it’s fair share of problems with cheap (for London) property and in great need of regeneration – but why aren’t these children getting the lecture I did? Or are they and they are choosing to ignore the advice?

Whatever the reason behind this junk food fest as 8 am every morning, the long term effects are worrying. Not only are these children going to be prone to putting on weight and in the worst cases developing obesity, but their blood sugar level is going to be all over the place with great highs followed by energy slumps.

<a href="http://www.jamieoliver.com/schooldinners">Jamie Oliver has done wonders for school dinners</a>. But there’s little point having a nutritious meal at lunch time if these kids have started the day with a burger and head straight to the chippie after school. I challenge Oliver to look at these children’s eating habits out of school if he really wants to have the long term healthy effects he so desperately craves for the youth of today.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Britney Spears meltdown</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/2007/10/britney-meltdown.html" />
   <id>tag:www.communitycare.co.uk,2007:/blogs/childrens-services//9.15206</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-02T14:30:44Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-02T14:51:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Clare Jerrom You have to feel for Britney Spears. After a very public meltdown, she has, within a matter of weeks, fallen out with her family, made an appalling “comeback” at the MTV Music Video Awards, been dropped by...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Simeon Brody</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Child protection" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="22234" label="Britney Spears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26349" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1880" label="child protection" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26347" label="K-Fed" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23527" label="Kevin Federline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1309" label="mental health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/childrens-services/">
      <![CDATA[<img style="float:left; margin:0 5px 5px 0;" alt="Clare Jerrom" title="Clare Jerrom" src="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=3697" width="60" height="60" />By Clare Jerrom

You have to feel for Britney Spears. After a very public meltdown, she has, within a matter of weeks, fallen out with her family, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6986539.stm">made an appalling “comeback” at the MTV Music Video Awards</a>, been <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/18/wbritney118.xml">dropped by her management company</a> and yesterday she <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7023124.stm">lost custody of her children</a> to ex husband <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Federline">Kevin Federline</a> – aka K-Fed.

]]>
      <![CDATA[The woman clearly has problems that certainly need to be addressed and having read many of the articles about Britney, I can understand why Judge Scott Gordon decided that the children would be better off with their father.

It is bad enough for anyone suffering a breakdown of any kind. But when you are in the public eye, unfortunately everyone else sees the full extent of your trauma too. It has been impossible to find a magazine or newspaper that hasn’t been criticising Britney for her “wild” behaviour or parenting skills.

Watching Britney over the past few months has not been like watching a car crash – it’s been more of a train crash. Since her break-up with K-Fed, she has been <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2006/11/20/britney-hangs-with-paris-drops-pants-in-public/">pictured out partying</a> with fellow celebrity Paris Hilton, <a href="http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article.html?in_article_id=61725&in_page_id=7">snapped canoodling a man</a> topless in a swimming pool, publicly <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6372623.stm">shaved her head</a>, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=437993&in_page_id=1773">attacked paparazzi </a>with an umbrella, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6380827.stm">gone into rehab</a> - I could go on.

Call me old fashioned but I feel this behaviour is a direct result of being thrust into the limelight at such a young age. At just age she was 8 she was auditioning for the Disney Channel series the Mickey Mouse Club. She was deemed too young. Prophetic words. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britney_Spears#1998.E2.80.932000:_Early_commercial_success">However by 11 she joined the Mickey Mouse Club</a> where incidentally she met ex-boyfriend Justin Timberlake. 

The list of celebrities who have success at a young age and end up in their early twenties with a variety of problems are well documented: Amy Winehouse’s current troubles are all over every tabloid every day and Robbie Williams, Daniella Westbrook Kerry Katona are just three who have admitted their problems in their autobiographies. There has to be a link. Children should be allowed to be children and enjoy their youth, playing hide and seek, crabbing at the beach, collecting feathers. And I’m afraid children who are sent to stage school and made to compete from a young age miss out on all that.

Britney tried to make her stage comeback last month hoping to regain her pop Princess title but critics <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbiz/article-23411585-details/'Stripper'+Britney+Spears'+MTV+comeback+bombs/article">slammed the performance.</a>  

This will have undoubtedly knocked her confidence and now she has lost custody of her two children Sean Preston and Jayden James. 

I’m sure, that for now at least, judge Scott Gordon’s decision is the right one: Britney clearly needs help and the children need to be protected. Her former bodyguard has come out saying there were "<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7023124.stm">issues of nudity</a> by Ms Spears, drug use, and safety issues involving the children post-rehab". If there are child protection concerns, the children certainly have to be placed in a safe environment.

But I fear that without the incentive of her children to focus on, who will give her a reason to get herself straight for, Britney’s mental health will get worse. I hope that while the children are now deemed to be in a safe place that Britney can be placed in one too and that she finally gets the help and support she so clearly needs.

<!-- Altering or removing this link is a breach of the Vizu Terms and Conditions --><div style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:10px;height:20px;text-align:center;width:160px;margin:0;padding:0;"><a href="http://www.vizu.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:#999;text-decoration:underline;font-size:10px;">Opinion Polls</span></a><span style="color:#999;">&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;</span><a href="http://answers.vizu.com/market-research.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color:#999;text-decoration:underline;font-size:10px;">Market Research</span></a></div><embed src="http://wp.vizu.com/vizu_poll.swf" quality="high" scale="noscale" wmode="transparent" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="160" height="240" name="vizu_poll" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" FlashVars="js=false&pid=51363&ad=false&vizu=true&links=true&mainBG=00cccc&questionText=FFFFFF&answerZoneBG=EEEEEE&answerItemBG=FFFFFF&answerText=000000&voteBG=C8C8C8&voteText=000000"></embed>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
