Did this 'Baby P' ad really go too far?

user-pic
| No Comments | No TrackBacks

This is what the controversy was about.

 

Barker-new.jpg

Although I believe the Advertising Standards Authority was correct in ordering an animal rights pressure group to take down the poster featuring Baby P abuser Steven Barker, part of me thinks that it raised an important subject.

Namely that, as Community Care has reported in the past, research shows that many children who abuse animals have behavioural problems in later life.

It isn't a given, but evidence suggests a strong connection.

As my colleague Molly Garboden pointed out yesterday, the animal welfare group in question, Peta, has a history of using shock tactics in its attempts to raise awareness.

The latest drive went further and, placed as it was in Haringey - the home borough of Baby Peter Connelly - it was always likely to offend.

Peta stepped over the line, but it ruined a golden opportunity to highlight an important child protection issue, while at the same time promote its own causes.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/116237

Leave a comment

About Outside Left

   
  Outside Left questions the thinking behind today’s social policy, with a sometimes wry, occasionally cynical, always straight-talking look at the political elite that shapes it, written by sub editor, Mike McNabb.

 

  Outside Left home
     
  Follow Outside Left on Twitter Follow Outside Left on Twitter

 

How to get in touch

     
  Email: Mike McNabb

 

More from Community Care

Keep up to date

  Enter your email address, in the box below, to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by MT-Notifier

  Subscribe to this blogs feed 

Subscribe to our blog RSS feed