
Graham Stuart MP tabled the EDM at the Houses of Parliament
When the British Association of Social Workers wrote to members explaining why it was rebranding as BASW - the College of Social Work, it asked them to show their support by encouraging local MPs to sign an early day motion.
And so they duly did - well, at least 19 of them. For that is how many MPs have signed the EDM since it was tabled on 27 January.
But one has to wonder whether all of these MPs understand what it is they're signing.
For, if you read the EDM closely, it could arguably be interpreted as referring to the other college of social work, i.e. the one being developed under the reform programme in England.
The motion says:
"That this House recognises the vital role of social work in protecting, helping and empowering children and adults in vulnerable situations at critical times in their lives; notes the 2009 Social Work Taskforce recommendation for the creation of an independent national college of social work, developed and led by social workers; supports the establishment of a College of Social Work which is independent of Government, led by and accountable to social workers and strong enough to influence the development of the profession; and therefore calls on the Government to support the establishment of such a college, without public subsidy, delivering a truly independent voice for the social work profession."
Most of these attributes could be applied to either college. The key point, I'm sure BASW - the College of Social Work would argue, is that this EDM calls for a college "without public subsidy".
But the other college could argue that, although it has received seed funding to cover its start-up costs, it will move to a membership-funded model within the next year or so.
So, depending on who you listen to, this vision of a college could refer to either one. Confused? Join in the ever-fascinating CareSpace debate about the two colleges.
Photo by Rod Mclean/The Travel Library/Rex Features