by Helen Bonnick Jamie's Dream School (Wednesdays, Channel 4) has received a lot of predictable flak - it's exploiting the students who are manipulated by the cameras' presence, it places unfair levels of expectation on teachers and the degree of foolishness on Jamie Oliver's part to imagine it would work.
I would counter such criticism by pointing out that while the original aim was to see if it was possible to re-interest disengaged students in the education process through inspirational teaching, there are also other politically timely lessons here.
Firstly, that there is more to teaching than being an expert in your field. Teachers everywhere should take comfort in this, in the face of proposals that only top class degrees would be acceptable, or failing that, a stint in the army (ex-squaddies have been suggested to deal with the appalling lack of discipline, allegedly rampant in all our schools).
Secondly, there is a lesson in David Starkey's emotional justification of his own bullying behaviour (episode 2). He had been painfully humiliated by just such an approach in his own school days, but knew of no different way to instil respect and obedience - for which read absolute compliance.
Another one for the teachers - in the end honesty and respect in discussion and approach can trump spectacle and extravagance. The overall plea from the youngsters was to be treated with respect. By the end they appeared more ready to understand this as a two-way process.
Amid all our developing understanding of different learning styles, of social exclusion, and of what makes a good school, it seems to me that we continue to ignore the fundamental questions which determine the whole direction of the education system and the engagement, or otherwise, of these young people.
What should education be about, and who is it for? The individual child, the good of society, or the masters of industry?
Answer that one wrong and all the Dream Schools in the world will have taught us nothing.
Helen Bonnick is a school-based social worker
