in

Child protection gone mad?

Last post 07-15-2008 7:23 PM by lizzer. 5 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-11-2008 4:33 PM

    Child protection gone mad?

    Yesterday Esther Rantzen said that child protection has turned into a politically correct monster with teachers not allowed to put sunscream on children, or give them a hug if they fall over or hurt themselves etc. What do you think?

  • 07-11-2008 5:21 PM In reply to

    Re: Child protection gone mad?

    I think Ms. Rantzen's comments need to be clarified: what she actually stated was she did not intend to unleash this politically correct monster.  She states (according to the Daily Mail- you decide  the accuracy-Hmm) that she was only attempting to highlight abuse within the family. (quite admirable and where the overwhelming percent occurs) However, she continues to state that 'joe public' is under the eye of the thought police.  And a giant beaurocratic mess has been created.  And a witchhunt/hysterical attitude- particularly towards men- has been created.  We are now in "an insane state of affairs". And the public are unable/too afraid/not trusted to use their common sense.  And..... Well, I warned about this how situation 4 years ago when the mission creep began and I feel no smug satisfaction from that. Take her statements with the recent Civitas report, the campaign in the Times, and the floppy and inadequate response of anyone in authority to do with the matter...(we will leave the 25% of the population needing vetting issue aside for a moment) and what do we get?  Just more of the same. Until those in authority or with 'media appeal' stop looking for an abuser on every corner and in every home, our children are being denied the right to BE CHILDREN.  And parents are being denied the right to parent.  Witchhunts, smoke, mirrors and the mantra of 'if you say it often enough, people will believe you' need to go- and anyone indoctrinated into the PC thinking associated- for the sake of REAL child protection. I am pleased Ms. Rantzen has seen the misguided zealotry and hypocrisy of her past. (Think of the Sheffield case).  I just hope her mind can remain focused on real child protection and not sound bites.

     

    “First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”

    —Martin Niemoeller
  • 07-13-2008 8:07 PM In reply to

    Re: Child protection gone mad?

    Ordinary people try to say lots of things but who listens

    Tickets for Believe in me available from 16 July. Come and help change things for the better

    Believe in me- Stafford Gatehouse Theatre, 25 September 2008

     

    Tickets available from the Stafford Gatehouse Theatre from 16 July by phone only to keep them free to you. [ BASW is kindly paying the ticket bill]

    Box Office number 01785 254 653

    Website for directions

    www.staffordgatehousetheatre.co.uk

     

    Believe in me is a unique event.

    Initiated by a social worker, Rachel Bramble who had observed over two decades the growth in both social work and the media but with no meeting ground and negative outcomes for the public. She decided to gather together a motley group of people to discuss where to go next, bearing in mind the ageing population of the UK.

     

    Central to ‘ Believe in me’ is Phoebe, the seventeen year old daughter of Rachel Bramble who will not only talk about what it’s like to spend your whole life as a social workers’ child, but also be a hostess for the day encouraging members to work positively together.

     

     ‘Believe in me’ is about action as much as discussion. Rachel believes that there is common ground between the groups and has initiated four action groups to not only find this common ground but work towards positive collaborations for the future.

     

     Group A is made up of service users They will consider what impact the relationship between social work and the media has had on them and how things could be improved.

    What kinds of services would they like from social workers and how they would like to be reported by the media.

     

    Group B is lead by Professor Sue White and John Hemming MP who will consider whether current policies has caused bad social work practice and what can be done about it.

     

    Group C gives Rachel Bramble the initiator of ‘ Believe in me’ the opportunity to launch her model A.E.R.O [ Aspirations, Encouragement, Realism and Openness] which she uses as a social worker in a school in Staffordshire. Joining her will be Professor Mark Doel and David Kidney MP [ Stafford MP] who will consider how the philosophy of A.E.R.O could go beyond school and permeate throughout social work and into the media.

     

    Group D is lead by Professor Keith Popple, media workers and academics. Their brief is to consider why media workers have difficulties reporting and making programmes that involve social workers and why there has never been a TV soap with social workers as the central theme. The aim by the end of the day is to find a way to get that soap on TV.

     

    Believe in me is as much about outcomes as discussion, throughout the day attendees will be encouraged to share not only their experiences but also ideas about how things could be changed for the better. For those who do not like to speak out publicly there will be chances to record their commitment to a better future.

     

     ‘Believe in me’ is free to attend no refreshments will be provided to keep the event simple. There are plenty of shops and eating places within a few minutes walk from the Gatehouse Theatre, which also has its own café.

    The Theatre is a fifteen minutes walk from Railway Station.

      

    Proposed programme

     

    10 am Intros – By Professor Michael Preston Shoot our chair, troubleshooter and host for the day.

     

    10,05am Phoebe talking about her life as the daughter of a social worker

     

    10.20 am Rachel Bramble- The Mouse and the Lion- The relationship between social work and the media and discussion

     

    10.45am break [don’t forget your refreshments or pop across the road to Brambles]

     

    11.15 Action groups choose one of the four

     

    12.45 Lunch – chill and chat [Plenty of food places within a few minutes walk or join the Stafford regulars in the Gatehouse café]

     

    1.45 Action groups – choose a second

     

    3.30 Finale in the main theatre- Outcomes of groups and thoughts for the future

    Note Students from Wolgarston High School will be feeding back their views of the action groups.

     

    4.15 finish.

     

    Samples of reasons why attending ‘ Believe in me’ 25 Sept Stafford Gatehouse Theatre

     “I am a social work academic with 12 years practice experience in statutory child care and a further 14 years experience as a researcher and educator in child welfare. My research is ethnographic in nature and involves spending substantial amounts of time observing practice. My last research project was concerned with studying the impact of the implementation of various electronic systems intended to facilitate information sharing in children's services. My current study is examining the impact of performance management on everyday practice. Over the last five years substantial policy change has taken place and social workers now spend a good deal of their time entering data onto computers and feeding audit trails. This takes them away from 'the day job' and the 'real work' and I believe introduces substantial latent error into the child welfare system. Whilst no system, however controlling, can ever stifle the ingenuity of individuals, social workers are often working against the odds managing repetitive data entry requirements of poorly designed IT systems, and subject to precipitous time scales for decision-making which are centrally imposed. I do not think these are the optimum conditions of possibility for wise and compassionate practice and that is why I am attending this conference.” Sue White Professor of Social Work
    Department of Applied Social Science
    Lancaster University
     “How society deals with families and family law is a key foundation to the way in which society operates.   A key element of this is how social workers deal with children at risk.  If the government pressurises social workers to do the wrong thing then it is the government that is at fault rather than the social workers.  Although adoption targets have been scrapped we still face problems with the Common Assessment Framework and other managerial pressures.  I am attending this conference to put the case for traditional British social work practise, which places the emphasis on the family rather than the state.  This requires a more accountable system where bad practise is weeded out.”

    John Hemming MP

      

    “I'm supporting 'Believe in Me' because I believe in the kind of positive social work which this initiative is promoting.  There is a lot of positive social work happening and Rachel Bramble's AERO' model is in a fine tradition of creative and positive social work. We need to find ways of getting positive experiences of social work better known - find ways of getting people talking about it. Social workers have often been hostile to the media (understandable, because the media is often not too friendly to social work) but we must find friends in the media to promote positive social work. People know what teachers, doctors and most other professionals do, but there's a lot of ignorance about what social workers do. There's an urgent need to develop a more universal social work, one that has general public support. 'Believe in Me' can play its part in this and deserves our support.”

     Professor Mark Doel

     Research Professor of Social Work in the Centre for Health and Social Care Research Sheffield Hallam University

     

     

          

     

    lets get social workers into schools and get that soap.
  • 07-15-2008 9:25 AM In reply to

    Re: Child protection gone mad?

    Kathleen Marshall, Scotland's Commissioner for Children and Young People, has warned repeatedly of the dangers of an over-protective attitude towards children, "that reduces their opportunities for play, leisure, recreation and healthy development" (see the joint UK Children's Commissioners report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child - you can find it here).

    Prof Marshall says this is particularly prevalent in the care system for children in Scotland, and cites examples of the overly-zealous application of guidelines by support workers, to the extent that the freedom of the child in care is seriously inhibited. (One boy was told he had to be accompanied by a member of staff simply to go ride his bike around the local estate. Inquiries later found that this was because the support worker mistakenly used guidelines for mountain biking, where the risks are obviously far greater.)

    The Social Care Institute for Excellence has also highlighted concerns about the culture of blame in children's social work - see our story here.

    The risk-averse culture is definitely in the social care system, but I can't see that any top-down policy is going to solve it. On this occasion I'd prefer to see individual professionals encouraged to use their judgement, as any sensible parent would.

  • 07-15-2008 6:13 PM In reply to

    • Aimes
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 01-14-2008

    Re: Child protection gone mad?

    I for one am not a fan of Ms. Rantzen. I tend to feel she often jumps on the bandwagon, doing little actual work herself, in an attempt to get publicity.

  • 07-15-2008 7:23 PM In reply to

    Re: Child protection gone mad?

    I agree with you Aimes. Did anyone see the interveiw with her on GMTV when she first started discussing this?  She got a bee in her bonnet about people being too PC which is one of my pet hates - people complaining about political correctness gone mad- as i think the power of language to exclude people is massive 

Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
© RBI 2001-2008