This is a really interesting issue.
There are clear ethical issues about strike action in terms of its impact on service users, and in a sense it must go against your professional values. Do people think the ethically right thing to do for a social worker who is a member of a union to cross a picket line?
My question is whether that means employers have you over a barrel? That social workers' conscientiousness can help prop up unjustifiable pay and conditions, perhaps more so than in other sectors.
Interestingly, BASW - in its current discussions on forging closer links with a union - appears to be taking this debate full circle, by drawing the link between good terms and conditions and the quality of practice within an organsation, in terms of their impact on retention, motivation, levels of absence etc. And then there's the fact, revealed by one of our recent surveys, that 40% of you have taken a second job to make ends meet, which can't be that healthy, either personally or for you rpractice.
This also feeds into the whole issue of whether it's better to have a social work only union - which we no longer have with Buswe having joined Community - or a general union which includes social workers.
Would it be better to have a social work union which took a coherent policy on strike action (i.e. only as an absolute last resort) or do social workers do better in a more general union, where more "militant" professions (particularly in a multi-sector setting such as local government) can take the lead on industrial action with the benefits accruing to all?