Cookies & Privacy Supreme Court - KM v Cambridgeshire - Adults' services - Professional forums - for social care professionals - Social Work Forum - Carespace from Community Care
Community Care's CareSpace
The online community for social care

Supreme Court - KM v Cambridgeshire

Bookmark and Share Skip to the end

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
CS Posted: 10 Feb 2012 4:19 PM

The question posed by the the case of KM v Cambridgeshire is not "can Councils take their resources into account" when allocating resources. Of course they can and of course they have to when working within a cash limited environment. The question is how they do it - are they doing it in a way that is a) lawful and b). fair and c) makes best use of public money. I would expect the Supreme Court to find that the original High Court decision was none of these things - in fact it was quite irrational. That is because it allowed the Council to arrive at a base size of the Personal Budget  using the arithmetic RAS process, and then added on top an element for special needs. But what it failed to do was understand that the original RAS allocation bears no relation to the real cost of meeting needs. It was like putting a slate roof on a mud hut. It will be a great service to the future of Social Care if the Supreme Court jusgement exposes the irrationality of the RAS process.

Colin Slasberg

Top 75 Contributor

Oh dear .... Are the Judges under the impression that the RAS is a scientific calculation? If only they knew the reality.

I have to go to court to explain why a SU cannot have supported living, I ran my reasons through an Advanced Practitioner and they said yes and just add that the RAS does come anywhere near the cost of supported living, I said well it doesn't anyway - even for those who need it!!!!!

The RAS is a complete farce, it works for middle class families that know how to get the best out of it, interestigly they have changed my SRQ in my LA and the points are reduced if you have informal networks of support - so you therefore have less budget to work with (instead of giving more to those who have no informal support they give less to those with informal support).

To me its just another paper exercise that confuses a lot of service users, I agree with the principles of the personalisation agenda, and for some people, they can say give me the money and I'll show you how I can (and do) utilise it better than you can, for others it doesn't make a blind bit of difference.  

Top 50 Contributor

A1ext:
interestigly they have changed my SRQ in my LA and the points are reduced if you have informal networks of support - so you therefore have less budget to work with

Sounds like you are between a RAQ and a hard place....

Top 75 Contributor

Hmmmmmm.......Cool

Top 50 Contributor

I need to work on my subtlety  

Top 25 Contributor

Hatgirl:

I need to work on my subtlety  

 

made me laugh anyway

 

 
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS
© RBI 2001-2012