The Simon Heng column

    Like so many other health authorities, one of our local primary
    care trusts finds itself severely over-budget, and is proposing to
    reorganise its services to reduce its deficit. Part of this plan is
    to reduce or relocate some of the services provided at a local
    community hospital.

    One member of the service user group has decided to challenge
    the individuals who make up the management structure of the PCT to
    admit personal responsibility for any unnecessary suffering or
    death that might arise from withdrawing services from that
    particular unit – or resign.

    The gist of his argument is that no one is forced to stay in
    post and take particular decisions or actions. Each individual
    always has the option to refuse or resign rather than implement
    policies that will cause harm to other people.

    In a letter to me, he states that front-line staff and service
    providers are held personally responsible for the services they
    provide, and, for the most part, they accept that responsibility –
    they are frequently held to account for mistakes as well as for
    professional decisions. Then he argues: “On the other hand we have
    the politicians and managers… (who) will go to extreme lengths in
    an attempt to avoid or disown any personal responsibility when
    their decisions and actions are challenged… Even when given a
    direct order… human beings are still personally responsible.
    ‘Following orders’ was rejected as a defence as long ago as 1945 by
    the Nuremberg Tribunal.”

    There are precedents for politicians resigning on a matter of
    principle: Robin Cook over the Iraq war, for example. There are
    even examples of heads of services resigning after catastrophic
    failures in their organisations, such as the Cambridgeshire police
    chief after the Soham case.

    But these are different to expectations that health service
    managers – or governing bodies – take personal responsibility, or
    resign over specific cases. How could one trace legal
    responsibility back to one individual for setting the budget in the
    first place?

    What’s your opinion?

     

    More from Community Care

    Comments are closed.