Essex Council is likely to review its allowances for kinship foster carers after agreeing an out-of-court settlement this week with a couple who had threatened to take it to judicial review.
The couple had applied for a review because the council pays a lower weekly allowance to carers who are relatives of children than to professional foster carers.
Essex’s weekly rate for kinship carers looking after children aged up to four is £72, compared with £108 for professional carers.
The couple’s solicitor, Nigel Priestley, said the council’s payments to kinship carers were “plainly illegal” because they failed to recognise a judgment in 2001 by Mr Justice Munby. In a case brought against Manchester Council, he ruled that it had to pay foster carers according to the needs of the children they were caring for, not according to their relationship with a child.
A spokesperson for Essex Council said: “Whenever a case of this type is issued against us we will always examine our policies accordingly.”
Essex forced to review foster rates
September 7, 2006 in Carers, Fostering and adoption
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Job of the week
Featured jobs
Employer Zone
‘Solutions can’t be scripted here – you have to be creative’
Putting a team around the social worker to make a difference to families
How working in residential care enables staff to build one-on-one relationships with young people
‘We will always challenge ourselves to transform our services to improve outcomes for children and families’
‘It’s our job is to observe the child, find their voice and be their advocate’
Employer zone – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Community Care Inform
Latest stories
Review proposals to ‘axe’ child protection conference chairs a ‘massive concern’, warns BASW
Care review urges national social work pay scales to reward expertise and boost retention
‘Why only specialist child protection teams will tackle the annual child death toll’
Frontline’s social work qualification rates lower than other fast-track schemes’, data shows
Comments are closed.