Family courts leaders have accused the government of having a cost-cutting agenda after it decided against granting separate representation rights to all children in contact and residence cases.
The plans, published for consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs, mean children involved in private law cases would be given a court guardian only where legally necessary, such as where a child has evidence that cannot be given by another party.
But Alistair MacDonald, joint chair of the Association of Lawyers for Children, said there was no “welfare justification” for the decision and that it seemed financially motivated. Alison Paddle (pictured), chair of guardians’ body Nagalro, said: “It seems that this is governed by cost cutting rather than the principle of ensuring that children need access to legal representation.”
Section 122 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002, which came into force at the start of the year, was meant to bring in separate representation for children in all private law proceedings, expanding on family court rule 9.5, which allows it in the most complex cases.
But the DCA delayed implementation while it considered more evidence on its likely impact.
Separate Representation of Children
Contact the author
sally.gillen@rbi.co.uk
Guardians decision ‘led by cost-cutting’
September 7, 2006 in Children, Family support, Looked after children
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Job of the week
Featured jobs
Employer Zone
‘Solutions can’t be scripted here – you have to be creative’
Putting a team around the social worker to make a difference to families
How working in residential care enables staff to build one-on-one relationships with young people
‘We will always challenge ourselves to transform our services to improve outcomes for children and families’
‘It’s our job is to observe the child, find their voice and be their advocate’
Employer zone – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Community Care Inform
Latest stories
‘Why only specialist child protection teams will tackle the annual child death toll’
Frontline’s social work qualification rates lower than other fast-track schemes’, data shows
‘Considerable investment’ in social work helps twice inadequate-rated council rise to ‘good’
Cafcass ‘in serious jeopardy’ regarding social work staffing due to pay constraints
Comments are closed.