Troubled council says grant released to help pay for adult social care will have ‘little impact’

Adult social care service at Northamptonshire council 'on the edge of unsafe', warns its director

Photo: fotolia/ baon

By Katherine Purvis

Northamptonshire Adult Social Services (NASS) has said the release of £1.7 million from earmarked reserves to help pay for adult social care will have “little impact given the size of our challenge” .

The grant, announced in the Local Government Finance Settlement, will be used to mitigate financial challenges and growth pressures, according to the council’s budget for 2018/19.

The troubled council has been forced to make almost £40 million in budget cuts after admitting “severe” financial challenges” and issuing a section 114 notice on 2 February. The notice, which will continue into the new financial year, banned spending on all services except those that meet its statutory obligations to safeguard vulnerable people.

As yet, the council has not been able to specify what these essential services are, or where the £220 million adult social care budget will be spent.

“Nobody’s issued a section notice on this scale and to this extent before, so nobody really knows what it means to be only essential,” Penny Smith, branch secretary of Unison Northamptonshire told Community Care. “It’s such unknown territory and I don’t think we’ll have a clearer picture until the ‘best value’ inspector releases his report [due on 16 March]. Everyone’s waiting on that.”

Despite budget overspends in 2017/18 and 2016/2017, Anna Earnshaw, the council’s director of adult social care, warned on Tuesday that the service was “severely underfunded” and on the “edge of being unsafe” with 2,000 unassigned cases.

The council explained that while adult social care has the largest expenditure of all Northampton’s services, it is one of the lowest funded of any county council and has one of the lowest staff bases. Meanwhile, its over 65’s population is growing faster than any other county and it expects the number to rise by 28% by 2024.

In its 2018/19 business plan, Northamptonshire Adult Social Services (NASS) proposed to bring Olympus Care – the council’s adult social care limited company – and First for Wellbeing – a holistic wellbeing social enterprise set up by the council, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Northampton – back in house to save money and simplify the delivery model.

“We cannot continue to meet rising demand and the costs of care created by these conditions within our existing budgets. There is no short term fix so we need to make sustained long term change where we meet our duties, protect the most vulnerable and deliver better outcomes but all within our limited resources,” the newly-created Adults, Communities and Wellbeing Directorate said in its plan.

To balance the budget, the council has raised council tax by 5.98% – the highest increase possible without a referendum and which includes the 3% adult social care precept. It has also announced the removal of all bus subsidies from mid-July, leading to concerns from the public and Martin Griffiths, Conservative councillor for Irchester, that older residents would be cut off.

“I believe it’s time to apologise to the elderly people in our community who will be isolated,” he said at a full council meeting on Wednesday. “… It’s time to apologise for the lack of foresight.”

In addition, a proposed 2% pay rise for all staff has been abandoned, prompting fears that more social workers will leave the authority.

“They won’t keep staff in any department if they don’t pay people properly.. The county shares borders with seven others, so people walk with their feet,” said Smith.

For two days of free essential learning and to boost your CPD profile, register now for Community Care Live Manchester 2018, taking place on 24-25 April at Manchester Central Convention Complex. Check out the programme here.

More from Community Care

One Response to Troubled council says grant released to help pay for adult social care will have ‘little impact’

  1. Blair McPherson March 7, 2018 at 2:32 pm #

    I don’ think there is a definition of “essential “. Where there is a statutory responsibility then it would be illegal not to provide a service. There is a statutory responsibility to provide a library service but if you closed all your libraries bar two one in the north of the council and one in the south and possible a one vehicle mobile service would this meet your statutory responsibilities. Likewise with reference to a safe adult social service or child protection service what is the definition of “safe’. The government appears to think these definition are financial as in what the council can afford but the courts may have a different view. In the end the Law Lords may have to decide.