Peer violence in care: how prolific is it and what do social workers need to know?

Christine Barter analyses how prolific peer violence is in the care system, and what needs to be done to help those suffering from it

Photo: REX/WestEnd61 (Picture posed by model)

by Dr Christine Barter, NSPCC senior research fellow, University of Bristol

When peer violence and abuse occurs in foster or residential care the impact on the child can be overwhelming.

The vast majority of children in care share family histories of violence, abuse and neglect. The re-victimisation of children through peer violence can have a profound impact on young people already struggling to cope with negative life experiences.

Despite this, the issue has not been the focus of significant attention.

How extensive is peer violence in residential and foster care?

Our research, indicates it is a common problem for children in residential care. We found three-quarters of the children we interviewed experienced physical violence, and half experienced emotional abuse from another child in the settings. Girls were more likely than boys to report sexual violence.

One large study, based on young people’s experiences in 48 children’s homes, showed that just under half of children reported attempts at bullying and a third of girls stated another resident had attempted to take advantage of them sexually.

Free webinar: neglect – how to gather and present evidence

Are you struggling with how best to evidence neglect in court? Join our free webinar with Joanna Nicolas to find out what needs to be included in your report.

Residential homes

My own experience as a residential worker in the 1980s was of homes with little guidance or specific aims, except to contain and control. Residential workers on the whole wanted to try and help, but were not provided with adequate skills or direction. We know now, from the plethora of child abuse scandals, that not all staff shared these values.

Peer violence, especially low level physical and emotional violence, such as name calling, were often viewed as a normal aspect of these settings: a finding which was reflected in our subsequent research.

However, research also showed there is significant variation in the rate of peer violence between similar homes. It is clear that homes can have a positive (and indeed negative) impact on children’s peer interactions.

Foster care

As for foster care, it is perhaps shocking that no specific research has examined the prevalence and impact of peer violence.

One study found a fifth of referrals concerning abuse in foster care involved another child as the instigator – mostly other foster children, a sibling or carers’ biological children. This highlights the distinct dynamics of foster care where both fostered and biological children often share the family home.

Both national and international research has identified sexual violence as a major risk, especially if the child’s known sexual risk was not reported prior to placement. Sadly, this is an all too often occurrence.

Others have shown the impact that foster children’s violence and abuse can have on biological children, either through direct experience or by witnessing violence towards their parents. Research shows these children often receive too little recognition and inadequate support.

The incidence and impact of peer violence in foster care is clearly identified in relation to foster placement breakdowns.

One placement breakdown is often followed by another if the trauma underpinning the child’s behaviour fails to be addressed. The consequences for all the children involved can be considerable.

Why do some children in care use violence?

Most evidence points to two interrelated reasons: the impact of children’s previous traumatic family experiences and the failure of the care system to adequately respond to this trauma.

It is not enough to remove children from abuse. We have a responsibility to ensure they get the support necessary to overcome the trauma they have experienced. Too often this is not provided and it must be addressed. A safe and secure home, where children feel valued and consulted, is obviously a good start.

In a recent paper published in child abuse review, ‘A life less ordinary: Foster carers’ views and experiences of negative peer interactions in fostering households’, I set out some of the key messages.

Frequent and flexible support

Carers identified that good pre-planning with detailed referral information was a pre-requisite. This helped them make an informed decision on whether they can match the needs of all children in their household, the level of appropriate supervision, and what support would be required.

Practical, individually tailored, training on behaviour management strategies was also requested by many. However, overall what carers most wanted was for social workers to provide frequent and flexible non-judgemental support for all family members, which viewed carers as equal partners and acknowledged they were experts in their own family dynamics.

There is also a pressing need to have proven counselling and psychotherapeutic interventions which incorporate both an understanding of the impact of family abuse and neglect, the drivers of peer violence, alongside an understanding of the care setting.

We have some way to go to achieve this and this should start by recognising the impact of peer abuse.

This piece is based on chapter five of the NSPCC book, ‘Promoting the wellbeing of children in care’, published in March.

More from Community Care

2 Responses to Peer violence in care: how prolific is it and what do social workers need to know?

  1. s April 22, 2015 at 4:58 am #

    A child in most cases removed from parents to protect them from abuse. This report shows that they experience the abuse in the place they should be protected and supported. The Government and local authority should find alternative ways if the residential homes are not able to provide the right support to vulnerable children. If the local authority remove a child from their parents it is also their responsibility to provide a decent life to those children. Government spends lots of money to residential homes and in most cases residential homes aims to make profit. Children need direction and support in their developmental stages otherwise their behaviour will go in the wrong direction. In my opinion if possible all removed children should have a supervised meeting with their parents so the above issues will be able to spot earlier.

  2. A Cook April 23, 2015 at 6:59 pm #

    In 2016 I will have been a Foster Carer for 10 years. My experience so far of child violence and abuse toward other children has been the fault of not sharing very important information about a child before the placement begins. In the past we’ve been assured that there is “no known history” likely to cause problems. “No history of sexualised behavior.” “no known history of violent behavior.” In one case we were later shown a document that read, “This child should be the youngest child in a placement by some margin.” That child punched my 9-month-old Grandaughter in the face while she sat in a baby-walker and nearly broke my Grandson’s arm (who is 3 years younger than the Foster Child). On another occasion siblings were allowed to share a bedroom and the eldest sexually assaulted the youngest. With those children we were told there was no history or known risk but another professional told us otherwise and the pediatrician said they had been to hospital before…. I would say sharing information has got better in the last 2 years. The need to take other children in the Foster Carers home into consideration is a must. It can’t be that the empty bed is the priority even at the expense of information sharing. Our home safe-care procedures can only be as good as the information shared before the placement begins.
    When a placement is provably inappropriate or unsafe (as was the case when my Grandaughter was punched and when one FC child was sexually assaulted by another) we shouldn’t need to fight a Social Worker and risk our own jobs and reputation when we try to advocate or keep another child safe by ending a placement) we should get support in recognizing the risk to other children or us.