Children's minister Beverley Hughes writes exclusively for Community Care on why local safeguarding children boards matter
Every Child Matters set out a vision for the future of children and young people and an ambitious programme of reform to deliver this. Central to the vision were five outcomes that we wanted to secure for all children: to be healthy; to stay safe: to enjoy and achieve; to make a positive contribution and to achieve economic well-being.
Enabling every child to stay safe requires everyone working with children to see safeguarding as part of their core business. Safeguarding is, of course, about child protection and tackling neglect and child abuse. That is critically important. But it is more than that.
Local safeguarding children boards should bring leadership to this area, bringing different local partners to work together to keep children safe. It is now one year since LSCBs were established in every local authority. This anniversary provides a good time to take stock and ask how well they are doing, which is why my department organised a conference for all LSCBs this week.
Our vision is for LSCBs to have an overarching role that gives safeguarding and child protection issues the gravitas they need across children’s services. LSCBs are vital in creating a focal point for agencies to come together to ensure there is an integrated and co-operative approach to promoting the welfare of all children and young people in the area.
Organisations in local areas are making good progress establishing their LCSBs and making the appropriate links to the children’s trust. They are aligning their priorities and agreeing clear responsibilities to avoid duplication and bureaucracy.
We know these boards are starting to reinforce local understanding of safeguarding and all that comes with it.
But, there is still much more to do.
Communication is crucial to make safeguarding a success. When professionals fail to share information, it could end in tragedy such as the unnecessary death of Victoria Climbié.
Social workers have difficult and pressured jobs, and I admire their commitment, but we still need to do more to get the basics right. Recent high profile cases have shown the absence of crucial procedures and the lack of someone with a clear handle on the detail of a case.
There have been cases where social workers make home visits but didn’t spot anything wrong because they don’t see, speak to – or listen to - the child in question: the simplest, most basic requirement.
Children respond to adults who work with them, and their perspective, their experience should be the focus in all we do.
Children will only be safe when the key agencies start working properly together and when basic, thorough child-centred practice becomes second-nature. We are not there yet, as many serious case reviews demonstrate. But I know the determination is there and every day I meet people who are passionately committed to keeping children safe and are doing what is necessary to ensure that this happens.
We are moving in the right direction, but there is still much to do to secure our vision – ensuring that every child stays safe.
Related item
Child protection information
Children's home staff: cut CRB bureaucracy, demands ICHA
13 October 2008
GSCC case: Social worker accused of being abusive to colleagues
19 May 2008
Children and Young Persons Bill: Last-ditch amendments fail
10 October 2008
GSCC conduct: Tricia Forbes wins appeal against register bar
13 October 2008
Conduct: Jacinta Hofstetter says GSCC has pro-employer bias
GSCC conduct: Tricia Forbes wins Care Standards Tribunal appeal
LGA demand inquiry into credit ratings of Icelandic banks
GSCC case: Jacinta Hofstetter's practice slammed by ex-colleague
Details of government consultations
02 October 2008
Private Member Bills
25 July 2008
Government Legislation
25 July 2008