More to lying than telling fibs

    Peter beresford writes that sometimes the telling of lies is
    necessary – to help the poor and powerless.

    Is lying the new rock and roll? The imprisonment of Jeffrey
    Archer and Jonathan Aitken before him appears to argue against
    this. But as with Robert Maxwell, perhaps the lesson really is
    dishonesty is OK – unless you get caught. After all, Private
    Eye
    pursued Archer for more than 30 years. It was Private
    Eye
    too, which first broke the story of the Bristol paediatric
    heart surgery catastrophe – another tale of dissimulation, deceit
    and cover-up, as well as incompetence.

    Sleaze and dirty tricks have figured disproportionately in UK
    political life since the mid-1990s. Commentators ridicule our
    politicians for saying one thing in opposition, and another in
    office, about privatisation, arms sales, asylum seekers, crime and
    workfare. They are not convinced by ministers’ protestations that
    it is circumstances, not they, that have changed. The sense that
    truth is now excess baggage seems to be one of the reasons
    underpinning the public alienation from politics highlighted by
    recent research.

    A measure of the importance of an idea is the number of words
    used to describe it. There have never been so many words for lying
    – blagging, bending, massaging, being economical with and glossing
    over the truth. What is “spin” if not lying and telling things in
    the most self-serving way?

    On the other hand, it’s all very well for Keats to write “Beauty
    is truth, truth beauty – that’s all ye know on earth, and all ye
    need to know”. But a crisis-ridden politician or policy maker
    required to reconcile “not in my backyarders”, determined user
    group, trade union and budget, knows there’s a bit more to it than
    that.

    If lying is not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing
    but the truth, there are also greatly increasing pressures to lie
    in health and social care. Insurers’ advice, the compensation
    culture and commercial considerations all push in this direction.
    Yet we have heard the same story over and over again in recent
    cases of people wronged in accidents and public care. “If they’d
    just admitted it and said sorry. It wasn’t the money we
    wanted.”

    When service users are asked what they want from social care
    workers, one of the key concerns, emerging in study after study, is
    for honesty and openness. It is the relationship with the worker
    that is central and people want one based on trust, equality and
    respect.

    That does not mean lying does not come into it. One social work
    trainee once said to me that his approach was based on a “ducking
    and diving” model of practice. He meant operating as skilfully and
    sometimes unconventionally as was necessary to maximise the small
    space he had in his agency to support service users.

    Every social care worker knows that this sometimes means telling
    lies to allow service users to access the benefits and services
    they should have. Here the issue is doing this in a way that is not
    demeaning or patronising, rather than keeping to the letter of the
    law. Maybe that is the bottom line for us all; to tell truth to the
    powerful and, wherever helpful, tell lies for the powerless.

    Yvonne Roberts in on holiday.

    More from Community Care

    Comments are closed.