Policies must address pockets of poverty

    Once, I had to rent a flat in central London for a very brief time.
    It was a dump and cheap but if I wanted to buy food, coming home
    late from work, I almost had to take out a bank loan. Even a pint
    of milk had a 50 per cent hike.

    At Community Care Live last week, community care minister
    Stephen Ladyman asked social workers to give him radical ideas for
    reshaping adults services. Someone should perhaps look at the
    perennial challenge of the poor marooned in a sea of affluence.

    Waverley borough, for instance, is in very upmarket Surrey. In an
    effort to retain a mixed economy, it has operated a principled
    policy of re-investing the returns from council house sales back
    into housing for those unable to afford the over-inflated prices of
    the commercial market.

    Now, the government has decided that 75 per cent of such revenue
    should be pooled to distribute as it chooses. The long-term result
    in Waverley, as elsewhere, will be communities with a vacuum where
    the young people in their twenties and thirties should be, driven
    out because they can’t afford to live in their own area. They leave
    and so does a vital source of labour for the social care and
    service sectors.

    Meanwhile, those on the very lowest income who do remain exist on
    benefits that fail to reflect that they live in one of the highest
    income areas in the country. Nor, as has been pointed out many
    times before, do they have access to a range of schemes such as
    Sure Start and neighbourhood regeneration.

    They could move, of course. But why should they – and divorce
    themselves from a network of friends and family? That is also the
    reason why, if benefits were customised to reflect say, regional
    differences in the cost of living, most claimants would not uproot
    and relocate where benefits are highest.

    The Conservative peer Lord Tebbit, once instructed job seekers to
    get on their bikes and find work. To his deep frustration,
    relatively few listened. In a cold and cruel world, the comfort of
    family – however fraught and tricky – is still infinitely
    preferable to a wage packet and living in isolation.

    Initially, the most deprived areas in Britain required priority
    action. Perhaps now, however, it’s time to adjust policy to help
    those whose equally desperate need is disguised by the healthy bank
    balances of their neighbours.

    More from Community Care

    Comments are closed.