It’s OK to say ‘I can’t cope’

    (The names of the service users have been changed)

    CASE NOTES
    Practitioner:
       Karen Taylor, care manager,  and Brian
    Marshall, practice  team leader.
    Field: Learning difficulties.
    Location: Glasgow.
    Client: Rory McFadden is a 25-year-old man with
    Down’s syndrome and  very limited verbal communication.  He lives
    with his mother, Fiona.  His siblings have all moved out and  his
    father died three years ago. 
    Case History:  Rory requires assistance in all 
    aspects of daily living and receives  36 hours a week day support
    from a  care provider, and attends a day service twice a week. His
    mother has mild learning difficulties and problems with anxiety and
    panic attacks. There is no doubt that she loves Rory but her own
    difficulties (not least a lack of positive parenting in her own
    childhood) have a large impact on her ability to care  for him.
    Previous care managers have consistently grappled with these
    concerns. Not long after Karen Taylor  took over the case Fiona’s
    ability  to cope deteriorated. 
    Dilemma: Although aware that she  was unable to
    cope, Fiona would not  ask for help for fear of having Rory  taken
    away from her.
    Risk factor: By allowing a vulnerable Rory to stay
    at home with his mum,  with all her difficulties, there was a risk
    that he may suffer from neglect.
    Outcome: Fiona is now able to ask for and accept
    help with caring for Rory –  and he continues to live at home with 
    his mum just as he always wanted.

    British parents who are struggling are less likely to ask for help
    for fear of being labelled failures than parents in some European
    nations, such as in Scandinavia.

    For Fiona McFadden, a mother of five, such a fear had been rooted
    in her past experiences. A woman with mild learning difficulties
    who drank heavily and was vulnerable to bouts of depression, she
    had frequently been unable to cope with her children, at times
    resulting in their removal by child protection social
    workers.

    However, now all her children have grown up and, all bar Rory, have
    moved out. Rory, 29, has Down’s syndrome. Last summer, despite an
    extensive support package in place, Fiona was finding it
    increasingly difficult to cope with Rory.

    “When I first got involved I was aware of the issues and my
    priority was to get in and establish a good relationship with
    Fiona,” says care manager, Karen Taylor.

    “The family had been known over the years to the department because
    of concerns over their parenting, and I think it’s fair to say the
    way the department had reacted had broken some of the trust with
    mum,” adds practice team leader, Brian Marshall. “That’s why we
    chose to work on that with Fiona – and in a way more in tune with
    an adult with learning difficulties because she had been used to us
    being a child protection agency.”

    At first, unsurprisingly, things were tough for Taylor. “Fiona was
    very difficult to get hold of – she wouldn’t answer the phone, and
    if she was in she might not answer the door,” she says.

    There were also concerns that Fiona was drinking at that time and
    associating with other people who were using her home as a party
    house. “She was lonely, depressed and letting inappropriate people
    into the house – and there was a major family dispute which
    involved Fiona being assaulted. Naturally we were concerned about
    Rory’s well-being,” says Marshall.

    Fiona then began to stay at times with a new partner, who lived
    outside Glasgow. She would take Rory with her thus depriving him of
    services. “She had no understanding of the need to pick up the
    phone and tell us. We all go away for a few days – that’s fine. The
    care provider even said if they had known they could have made
    attempts to visit so that Rory could get some support,” says
    Taylor.

    Marshall adds: “We had to tell her that going away like that wasn’t
    acceptable because she was putting Rory at risk. We wanted her to
    come home and work alongside us. We had no option but to call a
    vulnerable adults case conference.”

    The conference pulled together all those involved. “We focused on
    building relationships and supporting Fiona to cope with Rory’s
    care. In fairness, she was a caring parent but didn’t have the
    skills to cope.”

    Workers helped Fiona focus on the positive side of things. “It
    wasn’t just about what was she wasn’t doing, but rather what she
    was doing well and what we could help her with. For example, when
    Rory challenged, she would challenge back: shout, bawl and threaten
    him – because that was the way they went at each other. It’s easy
    to be judgemental about the physical stuff that’s going on – but it
    was a cultural thing for them. Rory also interacted in that way
    with his siblings and so we had to work around that,” says
    Marshall.

    He continues: “We had to show mum ways to positively parent and
    convince her that it’s acceptable to hold your hands up and say,
    ‘I’ve got a son with a learning difficulty: it’s hard and I’m not
    coping’. This was tough for her because in the past when she said
    that the department removed her children.”

    This is where the trust built up by Taylor became important. “When
    the case conference was set up she had already started to make
    significant changes to her lifestyle. Afterwards she said she was
    nervous but that it was really good to see all the people who cared
    for Rory, and recognised that it was for Rory’s benefit,” she
    says.

    It was a big turning point for Fiona. “Now everything is great,”
    smiles Taylor. “I still visit. She can’t read and her phone is cut
    off at the moment, but she now answers the door to me or if she’s
    upstairs she’ll shout out the window to me – which is something she
    would never have done before.”

    Marshall adds: “We recognise there will be times when mum’s health
    will impact on Rory – we know that. We’re aware of the issues but
    what we have is a level of trust with Fiona, who can now say to us
    ‘I’m not doing too well, I need help’. That’s the
    difference.”

    Arguments for risk

    • It is preferable to keep families together if possible. Rory
      and Fiona’s relationship may have been volatile at times but there
      was a recognisable bond and love between them. That was something
      worth preserving and worth the risk. “He was where he wanted to be
      – at home with his mum,” says Marshall.
    • The workers recognised that trust was the key to keeping Rory
      safe at home. By winning Fiona’s trust they knew that she would be
      able to get in touch if things were getting too much and accept the
      support needed. Home carers, day service staff and Taylor would
      between them still have daily contact with Rory – and would be able
      to monitor the situation; provided, of course, Fiona stayed at her
      home rather than visiting her partner.
    • The vulnerable adults conference ensured a consistency of roles
      and responsibilities. For example, Rory’s challenging behaviour is
      being managed consistently by home carers, day service staff and
      Fiona. 

     Arguments against risk

    • Fiona simply struggles to cope. Her reaction, rather than to
      seek help, is to withdraw, become depressed and drink excessively
      which adds to her depression.  Given Rory’s vulnerability, Fiona’s
      physical and mental health and lifestyle cannot be considered
      safe.
    • There appears to be a number of concerns raised that were not
      acted upon. As Taylor says: “Support staff would say that the house
      was not a hygienic, tidy or safe environment. But I had been in a
      lot worse. It did seem that the living area and kitchen were fine,
      other areas might not have been up to my standard but that wasn’t a
      major concern for me.” 
    • There were also reports that Rory was, among other things,
      untidy, poorly dressed and wearing the wrong sized shoes. However,
      Fiona displayed an inability to confront the truth. “When I tried
      to address these with Fiona, she would make out that other people
      were lying,” says Taylor.

    Independent Comment
    Taylor and Marshall have shown a real commitment to
    positive practice. They have shown that if you work with someone
    and relate to them as a person, you will establish trust, which
    enables things to improve, writes Kathryn Stone.

    At Voice UK we hear the most awful stories of people with learning
    difficulties having their children removed, simply because the 
    authorities cannot consider the fact  that people with learning
    difficulties can be good parents, with skills, information and
    support.

    What’s really good about this case is that Taylor and Marshall
    didn’t try to change Rory and Fiona; they changed everything around
    them to accommodate them as individuals. For example, by
    understanding that not everyone has a round-the-dinner-table chat
    to sort out their differences. It seems that they struck exactly
    the right tone here – protecting Rory as an individual and
    supporting Fiona.

    Now they could consider taking this good relationship further. For
    example, what are the alternatives for Rory?  Does he have an
    advocate to support him to think about what he wants for himself
    for the future? Does Fiona want to carry on with her lifestyle – or
    –  might she want to live her life differently?

    Social work can be about a very complex web of relationships and
    trust. This case has shown that if you truly believe that each
    person has a value then your trust will be repaid with benefits for
    potentially very vulnerable people.

    Kathryn Stone is director of Voice UK – a national learning
    difficulties charity

    More from Community Care

    Comments are closed.