Many factories run by a company funded by the government to employ disabled people are not offering value for money, according to new research.
The study, by spending watchdog the National Audit Office, finds it costs the government an average of £18,000 to employ somebody in a Remploy factory while the average annual wage earned was £11,000, under the Workstep scheme.
It also finds that one-third of organisations delivering the scheme, which aims to help disabled people move from supported to unsupported employment, had failed to permanently employ anyone in the three years since April 2001. Remploy is the scheme’s largest provider.
Bob Warner, Remploy’s chief executive, said the issues raised in the report had “important implications” for the company’s future and that it would respond in detail after consulting on these.
Margaret Hodge, minister for employment and welfare reform, said the government recognised there was more to do to help disabled people into work and it was reviewing its employment programmes for this group.
Remploy jobs ‘not value for money’
October 20, 2005 in Children, Disability
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Job of the week
Featured jobs
Employer Zone
‘Solutions can’t be scripted here – you have to be creative’
Putting a team around the social worker to make a difference to families
How working in residential care enables staff to build one-on-one relationships with young people
‘We will always challenge ourselves to transform our services to improve outcomes for children and families’
‘It’s our job is to observe the child, find their voice and be their advocate’
Employer zone – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Community Care Inform
Latest stories
Review proposals to ‘axe’ child protection conference chairs a ‘massive concern’, warns BASW
Care review urges national social work pay scales to reward expertise and boost retention
‘Why only specialist child protection teams will tackle the annual child death toll’
Frontline’s social work qualification rates lower than other fast-track schemes’, data shows
Comments are closed.