Thousands of families who care for other people’s children under residence orders will be eligible for a government grant after an Appeal Court ruling last week.
Judges said the Department for Work and Pensions had discriminated against Sara Francis, who stepped in to look after her sick sister’s baby, by refusing to give her a 500 Sure Start maternity grant.
The grant has not been available to people looking after babies under residence orders, but has been paid to adoptive and foster parents.
The boy was taken into foster care when he was only three days old. After visiting him regularly, Francis obtained a court order that he should live with her, but she ruled out adopting him because she wanted him to “know his roots”.
Francis’s lawyers had argued that she had parental responsibility for the boy and that her position was “analogous” to that of an adoptive parent.
But the DWP had claimed that paying the grant to Francis and others like her would blur the “bright line” of the policy.
A department spokesperson said officials were considering the ruling.
Sure Start grant victory for carer
November 16, 2005 in Children, Looked after children
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Employer Profiles
Sponsored Features
Workforce Insights
- How specialist refugee teams benefit young people and social workers
- Podcast: returning to social work after becoming a first-time parent
- Podcast: would you work for an inadequate-rated service?
- Family help: one local authority’s experience of the model
- ‘We are all one big family’: how one council has built a culture of support
- Workforce Insights – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Comments are closed.