Allowing secure training centre staff to restrain young offenders for the purposes of “good order and discipline” is a breach of the European Convention of Human Rights, the Court of Appeal heard last week.
A test case brought by a young person, known as AC, and backed by campaign group Inquest, claims the Ministry of Justice’s change to secure training centre (STC) rules last summer violated three convention rights, including the right not to be subjected to torture or inhuman treatment.
Previously, restraint could be used only to prevent trainees escaping, significantly harming themselves or others, or damaging property.
Representing AC, who was remanded to an STC although charges were later dropped, Patrick O’Connor QC said the change constituted a “substantial widening” of the circumstances in which restraint, including deliberately inflicting pain, could be used.
In February, in the same case, the High Court ruled the MoJ breached legal duties to consult children’s commissioner for England Al Aynsley-Green and to carry out a race equality impact assessment on the rule change, but did not violate the rights convention.
The Appeal Court has reserved judgement on the case.
For more on 2007 change to secure training centre rules go to www.communitycare.co.uk/106676
Related articles
YJB: Using restraint to secure compliance is a sackable offence
The debate: when should restraint be used
Methods for defining and restraint by setting
More information
Assistive technology and dementia: practice tips 
A trauma-informed approach to social work: practice tips 
Find out how to develop your emotional resilience with our free downloadable guide 
Develop your social work career with Community Care’s Careers and Training Guide 
‘Dear Sajid Javid: please end the inappropriate detention of autistic people and those with learning disabilities’
Ofsted calls for power to scrutinise children’s home groups
Seven in eight commissioners paying below ‘minimum rate for home care’
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Instagram
Comments are closed.