In summer 2011, the government published their formal response to Eileen Munro’s review of child protection, commissioned the previous year.Following the ministerial statement, Munro told Community Care: “I am very pleased to get such a positive response from the government.
This is the start of a long process of shifting from a compliance to a learning culture and the government response rightly emphasises that this needs to be a matter of the government working in partnership with the sector to make such fundamental changes.”
LATEST ARTICLES
- Progress on Munro’s social work reform
- Social workers frustrated at slow progress on Munro reform
- SCIE serious case review model aims to end social work blame culture
- Principal social worker: My job is about giving confidence back to social workers
- Birmingham’s social work academy
- Fear over plans to “slaughter” child protection guidelines
- The storm surrounding working together
MUNRO RECOMMENDATIONS |
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE |
TIMELINE |
||
Recommendation 1: Initial and core assessments should be scrapped and replaced with a single, ongoing assessment listing decisions to be made. |
Accepted 1 )The government will make full revision of Working Together to Safeguard Children and The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families.2) The government will implement an interim amendment to Working Together to Safeguard Children to remove assessment deadlines and the distinction between initial and core assessments. Eight councils are currently piloting the new flexibilities. |
1) By July 20122) Originally by December 2011 but the government has extended the trials to March 2012 and any changes will be part of the full consultation on Working Together later this year | ||
Recommendation 2: Unannounced inspections should examine the safeguarding performance of other agencies as well as children’s services. |
Accepted Ofsted and other relevant inspectorates are working on what a new model of inspectionwould look like. |
By May 2012 | ||
Recommendation 3: Inspections should also look at outcomes and how children’s wishes and experiences shape services provided. |
Accepted Ofsted intends to have a new local authority inspection framework in place, following a consultation in July 2011. |
By May 2012 | ||
Recommendation 4: A combination of nationally collected and locally published performance data should be used. |
Accepted 1 ) The government has published local performance information that will be published annually.2) The government is currently consulting with Ofsted and Director of Children’s Services on what will be on the list of nationally published performance information. |
1) By December 20112) By May 2012 | ||
Recommendation 5: Each Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) should submit an annual report to the Chief Executive and Leader of the Council, and (subject to legislation) to the local Police and Crime Commissioner and the Chair of the health and wellbeing board. |
Accepted The government will identify the appropriate legislative vehicle. |
As soon as practicable | ||
Recommendation 6: Local safeguarding children boards should assess local outcomes, including the effectiveness and value for money of early intervention services and multi-agency training. |
Accepted in principle The government will publish an amendment to Working Together to Safeguard Children regarding the role of local safeguarding children boards in monitoring effectiveness of early help and protective services. |
Originally by December 2011 but no further date given | ||
Recommendation 7: The role of the director of children’s services and the lead member for children’s services should be protected from departmental mergers. |
Accepted in principle The government is currently consulting formally on revised statutory guidance on the director of children’s services (DCS) role and the lead member to clarify and strengthen the role |
Originally by autumn 2011 but no further date given | ||
Recommendation 8: Research is needed on the impact of health reforms on partnership working in child protection. |
Accepted in principle The Department of Health and the Department for Education have published a joint programme of work. Following consultation the Chief Nursing Officer is currently working on a draft accountabilities framework. |
No new date given |
||
Recommendation 9: LSCBs should use a systems approach to serious case reviews (SCRs) and Ofsted’s evalution of SCRs should end. |
Further consideration needed The government will consider evidence and opportunities for using systems review methodologies for SCRs and options for developing the national resources recommended. The SCIE model is currently being tested on cases of child deaths in three councils |
Originally by second half of summer 2011. Formal consultation on new arrangements some time 2012. | ||
Recommendation 10: Councils should have a legal duty to provide enough early intervention services. |
Rejected The government has decided a new statutory duty is not needed as there is existing legislation already in place |
By September 2011 | ||
Recommendation 11: The Social Work Reform Board’s professional capabilities framework should specify those qualities needed for child and family social work. |
Accepted The professional capabilities framework and CPD framework, developed by the Social Work Reform Board, will include child specific skills and learning and be implemented. |
By autumn 2012 | ||
Recommendation 12: Employers and higher education institutions should work together on student placements. |
Accepted 1 ) The government expects the College of Social Work to develop plans for designated approved practice settings and teaching organisation status and to consider the merits of student units.2) The government will build partnership arrangements with employers and higher education institutions. |
1) By December 20122) By summer 2012 | ||
Recommendation 13: Local authorities should review and redesign the ways in which child and family social work is delivered, drawing on evidence of effective interventions and helping social workers use evidence based practice. |
Accepted Local leaders will undertake self-assessment, considering whether child and family social work services are appropriately configured so that they meet the needs of children and families |
At a locally determined pace | ||
Recommendation 14: Local authorities should designate a principal child and family social worker. |
Accepted 1 ) The government expects most local authorities to have chosen to designate a principal child and family social worker.2) The government expects that all local authorities “will have chosen” to designate a principal child and family social worker. |
1) By April 20122) By July 2012 | ||
Recommendation 15: A chief social worker should be created in government. |
Accepted in principle The government plans for a chief social worker to oversee children’s and adults’ services to be implemented. |
By late 2012 | ||
KEY DOCUMENTS
For that all-important background info..
Written ministerial statement from children’s minister Tim Loughton
Letter to Munro from Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Education
CRITICS
Read the challenges expert and frontline workers have put to Munro
Munro welcomed but funding fears fester
Munro Debate: A critical take on the review and Professor Munro’s reply
Comments are closed.