Scotland’s controversial pilot scheme to fast-track persistent
young offenders through the children’s hearing system has been
scrapped after proving to be less successful at cutting reoffending
than non-pilot areas, writes Derren
A Scottish executive evaluation showed that, on average, the six
fast-track pilots cut reoffending by persistent young offenders by
32 per cent, but non-pilot areas of similar size reduced it by 55
Analysis of the costs of running services compared with the savings
created from reduced reoffending showed fast-tracking cost
£4,000 a case while non-pilot sites produced savings of
£11,000 a case.
Under the system, young people who commit five offences are
referred to the children’s hearing system and their cases
prioritised so they get services to address their behaviour
Since being set up in February 2003 in Dundee, East Lothian, East
Ayrshire, North Ayrshire, South Ayrshire and Scottish Borders, 300
children have been fast-tracked and it was expected to play a key
role in reforms to the hearing system.
But following the disappointing findings, Scottish justice minister
Cathy Jamieson announced pilots would finish in September and the
extra £4.5m earmarked for them to run for another year would
be redistributed to all 32 local authorities.
She told pilots: “The evaluation results, which we have explored at
some length, do not offer the evidence I need to recommend
continuation or expansion.”
However, fast-track did achieve some targets: it processed cases
quicker, speeded up decision-making, and was well received by
professionals and young people.
Ruth Stark, professional officer for the British Association of
Social Workers in Scotland, said the findings proved speeding up
the system didn’t necessarily improve outcomes.
“I hope the money will now go into developing preventative measures
and early intervention to minimise children coming into the hearing
Bernadette Docherty, chair of the Association of Directors of
Social Work’s children and family committee, regretted the u-turn
and called for more detailed analysis of the findings.
- Fast-track evaluation from