A review of the Social Fund is needed to replace the loan system with one based on grants, a new report recommends.
Recipients of loans say repayments are too high and force them to live on less income, according to the study for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
The average weekly repayment rate was 8 per cent of income, but families with children were likely to borrow and repay more.
The Social Fund has three elements: community care grants, which are non-repayable and help people to live independently; repayable, interest-free budgeting loans to cover major expenses, such as furniture, incurred by benefit recipients; and repayable, interest-free crisis loans for people in emergencies.
Recipients favoured grants instead of loans because they would not need to be repaid. However, they preferred Social Fund loans to other credit options.
Child Poverty Action Group chief executive Kate Green said the system left families “struggling to repay loans from low weekly incomes”.
‘Replace loans with grant-based system’
June 8, 2006 in Adults
More from Community Care
Related articles:
Employer Profiles
Sponsored Features
Workforce Insights
- How specialist refugee teams benefit young people and social workers
- Podcast: returning to social work after becoming a first-time parent
- Podcast: would you work for an inadequate-rated service?
- Family help: one local authority’s experience of the model
- ‘We are all one big family’: how one council has built a culture of support
- Workforce Insights – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters
Comments are closed.