Local government bosses have branded Ofsted’s plans to start new multi-agency child safeguarding inspections this autumn as lacking in clarity and running the risk of drawing staff way from frontline child protection work.
In a joint response to Ofsted’s proposals to introduce ‘joint targeted area inspections’ this autumn, the Association of Directors of Children’s Services, the Local Government Association and the council chief executives’ group Solace also question whether these assessments will be as useful to local agencies as the current thematic inspections.
While welcoming the use of narrative rather than graded judgements and Ofsted’s recognition that the responsibility for safeguarding children extends beyond local authorities, the response is withering about the detail of the inspectorate’s plans.
“There has been a complete lack of transparency and clarity regarding the rationale, framework and longevity of the programme of joint targeted area inspections,” says the response before criticising the tight timescale and lack of opportunities for local agencies to comment on the plans.
The response also warns that joint targeted area inspections will place a heavy inspection burden on local government and duplicates key parts of the single inspection framework.
“It is simply not proportionate to retain the single inspection framework, commence a multi-agency joint targeted area inspection, a single-agency joint targeted area inspection focused only on the local authority, and begin a new inspection of SEND provision within the same short timeframe,” says the response.
Such a burden, it warns, will “draw staff and senior leaders away from frontline activity to service inspection”.
“We have previously called for an inspection regime that takes into account the contributions of all safeguarding partners to achieving better outcomes for children and young people,” said Alison O’Sullivan, president of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services.
“Sadly the complexity of this work is not yet reflected in these plans and I am not convinced that the joint targeted area inspection will add to our understanding of issues such as child sexual exploitation, radicalisation or disruption of gangs.”
Other criticisms in the response include the unclearness of Ofsted’s quality assurance processes for the new inspections and the watchdog’s plan to only notify local safeguarding children’s boards about when these inspections will happen rather than the agencies that will be inspected.
A trauma-informed approach to social work: practice tips 
Problem gambling: how to recognise the warning signs 
Find out how to develop your emotional resilience with our free downloadable guide 
Develop your social work career with Community Care’s Careers and Training Guide 
‘Dear Sajid Javid: please end the inappropriate detention of autistic people and those with learning disabilities’
Ofsted calls for power to scrutinise children’s home groups
Seven in eight commissioners paying below ‘minimum rate for home care’
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Instagram
Of course at the same time as Mr Osborne is asking social workers for ideas as to how to get more for less, a Quango is embarking on an exercise that will mean, in terms of front line child protection, that vulnerable children will get less as front line services are diverted to meeting the demands made by an inspection.
I am retired so thankfully have left all this rubbish behind.
My experience was that the present system took the valuable time of manages and social work staff away form the tasks that they should be doing in order to prepare for an OFSTED. Here we go again adding further to those peoples’ work. Where is the research that that includes a cost benefit analysis of the value of all these inspections?
My last experience of an OFSTED inspection in my agency was that preparation went on for six months prior to their visit. My experience, in the interview I had with the inspector, was that they had their own view of the area I was responsible for and were not at all open to a discussion about the conflicts and dilemmas of the work.
My view for many years has been that there has been too much emphasis in public services on creating an increasing number of roles that are critical and yet have no responsibility ( and increasingly less experience) of doing the work they are criticising