The shadow children’s minister has branded the government’s Children and Social Work Bill “one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation” she has seen as an MP.
Speaking at the National Children and Adult Services Conference today, ex-social worker Emma Lewell-Buck told sector leaders that barriers social workers face would not be addressed by the ‘power to innovate’ clause in the bill currently making its way through the House of Lords.
The clause allows the education secretary to grant councils exemptions from statutory duties under children’s social care for an initial period of three years, subject to parliamentary approval. Lewell-Buck said removing duties set out in law was unnecessary.
“I remember all-too-well the frustrations in practice but many of the things that social workers find inhibitive, such as excessive case recording, are in secondary legislation, guidance or part of the custom and practice of their local authority. All of which can be changed without primary legislation,” she said.
Lewell-Buck said ministers were not getting the “basics” right on social work reform. Reducing caseloads, preventing social workers from leaving the profession and training social workers holistically were all things the government had failed to do, she argued.
“One of the overriding problems is that the government seem unable to tackle the crisis in social work because they can’t address how to deal with the significant increase and the sheer number of people needing the service,” she said.
“To do that they would have to admit what many of us in this room know, closure of Sure Starts, removal of Early Years Help and family start. Punitive welfare policies, austerity measures are impacting everywhere and nowhere more starkly than in children and families social work.”
The government has been “unable” to explain where the demand for exemptions from social care legislation, contained in the bill, has come from, she added.
“This is poor legislation at its best. [It’s] making dangerous and fundamental reforms to children’s social work without consultation, any evidential base, any robust assessment. Worst of all, it’s a bill about children and social workers with no input at all from children or social workers.”
The government has said that the exemptions powers will be used to enable councils to test new ways of working in children’s services. In an effort to allay concerns over a lack of safeguards in the bill, it has tabled an amendment which would introduce a requirement for an expert panel to vet any application made by councils for exemptions so that the potential impact on children and families is assessed.
The chief social worker for children, Isabelle Trowler, has previously said the exemptions offer an opportunity to trial changes to a system that is currently “overly-bureaucratic”. She said most people agreed with the 2011 Munro review’s assessment that social workers were not being given enough time to do direct work with families.
“If we don’t support this power we can no longer complain that the system is too bureaucratic and that we were hamstrung by legislation,” she said.
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole 
Hampshire County Council 
Lincolnshire County Council 
Norfolk County Council 
Northamptonshire Children’s Trust 
South Gloucestershire Council 
Wiltshire Council 
Wokingham Borough Council 
Children and young people with SEND are ‘valued and prioritised’ in Wiltshire, find inspectors 
How specialist refugee teams benefit young people and social workers 
Podcast: returning to social work after becoming a first-time parent 
Podcast: would you work for an inadequate-rated service? 
Family help: one local authority’s experience of the model 
‘We are all one big family’: how one council has built a culture of support 
Workforce Insights – showcasing a selection of the sector’s top recruiters 
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Instagram
This is exactly the reason that experienced and talented workers are leaving the services. It is becoming unsafe and unsustainable with regard to workload and expectation due to blame, finger pointing and lack of ethical management! Training becomes secondary to number crunching, as does the issue of equipment simply to do the job in hand.
Totally agree Lou.
Labour should stop opposing things for opposition sake. This bill is well overdue and all MPs owe it to the people in this country to get it right first time and in good time. No partisan point scoring….any MP that does ought to be ousted from their post at the earliest opportunity.
Alex – Do you work/have you ever worked in the front line? This bill is purely and simply about allowing the private sector to cherry pick
This government are intent on privatising children’s services – it is not about ‘reform’ or listening to those that actually do the job – if they had they would have not closed early years centres, asked the voluntary sector to try and fill the gap then cut funding and other well planned tricks to diminish the service whist playing to the ignorant masses who swallow the media regurgitated propaganda wholesale.
This is dishonest legislation – and Alex, it is our duty to speak out and lobby on such things as this and you will find that it is in line with the standards expected of a registered social worker