‘Competing priorities’ affecting social work assessments, inspection finds

An in-depth inspection into neglect found an area working effectively, but social workers had limited time to spend with families

A council is not representing children’s views in many social work assessments because workloads mean practitioners are struggling to manage “competing priorities”, an in-depth inspection into neglect has found.

The jointtargeted area inspection analysing agency responses to neglect in Peterborough found social workers had “limited” time to spend with families.

“[Practitioners] manage competing priorities and, as a result, too many case records have little information about children and their views,” the report by Ofsted, Care Quality Commission and inspectors of police and probation services found.

However, it said the quality of assessments in children’s social care was improving and concluded that partner agencies, coordinated by the local safeguarding board, were working effectively to identify and respond to neglect.

“When children are assessed as being in need of help and support, they are the subject of multi-agency child in need plans, led by support workers who bring a range of appropriate knowledge and skills.

“This ensures that effective services are offered to support children who are experiencing neglect. This work is overseen, supported and reviewed by experienced, qualified social workers and managers, who authorise plans,” the inspection report said.


It added that a focus on recruitment and retention meant there was a more stable workforce in Peterborough, giving social workers better opportunities to know children better.

However, it found plans and interventions for children suffering from neglect “often lack focus and impact”.

“Assessments do not address the underlying causes or impact of neglect, and care planning is not outcome focused, clear or measurable. As a result, some children are experiencing neglect for too long before any change takes place,” the report said.

While the local safeguarding children’s board had developed a multi-agency neglect strategy, launched in September 2016, a lack of performance information meant agencies’ ability to monitor progress was “limited”.

“Currently there is too little improvement in levels of awareness of neglect, and limited effective use of resources and tools to identify its impact among frontline practitioners,” the report said.

To improve responses to neglect, an integrated multi-agency safeguarding hub with Cambridgeshire council was established last month, and Peterborough is beginning work to implement Hertfordshire’s family safeguarding model.

Wendi Ogle-Welbourn, executive director for people and communities in Peterborough, welcomed the report’s findings.

“There is lots of good joint working to deliver services for children, strong leadership and a commitment to identify new and creative ways of working, but we know there are areas we need to focus on to improve the way we support and protect children who are being neglected, and work is already ongoing in these areas to raise standards. The fact the inspectors found our own self-assessment of children’s services to be an accurate reflection reassures me that we are heading in the right direction.

Register now for Community Care Live London for two days of free and essential learning to boost your CPD, sharpen your legal knowledge and improve your practice, on 26-27 September.

More from Community Care

One Response to ‘Competing priorities’ affecting social work assessments, inspection finds

  1. Tracey August 17, 2017 at 6:55 pm #

    Unfortunately Peterborough fob off all cin cases to unqualified workers and fail to support them sufficiently in their roles. Amazing to read the spin the local authority puts on it all – reality is much worse than the report suggests !!