What the Health and Care Bill means for social workers

Social care lawyer Tim Spencer-Lane provides an overview of what's in new health and social care legislation, including the return of CQC oversight of council adult services and an end to the delayed discharge fines regime

Houses of Parliament
Photo: salparadis/Fotolia

By Tim Spencer-Lane

The Health and Care Bill was introduced into Parliament on 6 July 2021 and receives its second reading today (14 July). It represents another major overhaul of NHS structures, and has implications for the social care sector. The bill gives effect to the recommendations set out in the NHS Long Term Plan 2019 and the white paper Integration and Innovation, which was published in February 2021. Most of the reforms apply to England only.

The following summary highlights the key issues for social workers and other social care staff.

Return of CQC assessment of council adults’ services

The Care Act 2014 removed the duty – under section 46 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 – on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct periodic reviews of adult social services provided or commissioned by local authorities, assess the local authorities’ performance following each review and publish a report of its assessment. In addition, the Health and Social Care Act 2012 had limited the power of the CQC, under section 48 of the 2008 act, to carry out ‘special reviews’ of local authority adult social services to cases where this had the approval of the secretary of state.

However, the Health and Care Bill will introduce a new legal duty for the CQC to review and make an assessment of the performance of local authorities in discharging their ‘regulated care functions’ under the Care Act 2014. The exact functions in scope for review under the new duty will be set out in secondary legislation. The CQC will be required publish the findings of its reviews.

The reviews undertaken by the CQC will be by reference to objectives and priorities set for the CQC by the government. Review by the CQC will also be by reference to a set of quality indicators determined by the CQC and approved by the government. The CQC will be required to devise a methodology for assessing and evaluating local authorities, including the frequency by which it will undertake its performance reviews, which it must then set out in a statement to be approved by the secretary of state. The CQC may also consider that it wishes to review local authorities that perform above a certain threshold less frequently.

Where the CQC considers that the local authority is failing to discharge any of its adult social services functions to an acceptable standard, the bill will require the CQC to inform the government of this and recommend any ‘special measures’ that it considers should be undertaken by the government.

However, where the CQC considers that the failings are not substantial, it may instead choose to give notice to the local authority about what it considers the local authority is failing to do, the action that the CQC thinks should be taken to remedy failings and a timeframe within which the CQC thinks the action should be taken. The CQC must notify the government that it has taken this action. The CQC will also be given powers to conduct inspections for the purposes of its reviews.

This new oversight duty will sit alongside the CQC’s existing powers and duties to review adult social care.  These include the duty to conduct reviews and performance assessments of adult social care providers in section 46 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and the power – and duty when requested by the government – to conduct a ‘special review’ or investigation into a range of matters, including the provision of adult social care, under section 48 of the 2008 act.

Removal of delayed discharge regime

The bill will revoke the procedural requirements in schedule 3 to the Care Act 2014 known as the ‘delayed discharge regime’. In broad terms, this regime sets time limits for the completion of social care assessments and the provision of care and support services for NHS hospital patients, and fines to be paid by the local authority to the relevant NHS body for every day that the person’s discharge has been delayed where this has been caused by the local authority. It also sets requirements for communication between the NHS and local authority in relation to patients who were ready to be discharged and for the involvement of patients and carers during the discharge process.

The government has justified the removal of the delayed discharge regime in the following terms:

“Since the Care Act 2014 came into force, the requirement to carry out assessments before discharge has resulted in some individuals experiencing delayed hospital discharge as they wait for their assessment to be carried out, meaning the appropriate transfer of care cannot take place when a patient is ready to leave a hospital. Delayed discharges can result in poorer patient outcomes, such as loss of independence or functional decline such as muscle deterioration in patients who are elderly or have dementia; additional expense to the NHS as patients occupy beds without a clinical need; pressure on hospital beds so it is harder to give in-patients the healthcare they may need; and more complex or higher levels of care on discharge due to the loss of function described above.”

The policy intention is that, instead of a legislative framework, guidance on hospital discharge will set out the requirements and expectations of health and social care partners during the discharge process.

Integrated care boards and integrated care partnerships

The bill will establish statutory integrated care boards (ICBs). These will replace, and take over most of the functions of, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). Each ICB will consist of a chair, chief executive officer, and representatives from NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts, general practice, and local authorities.

Beyond that, local areas will be able to determine any further representation in their area. In the future, the functions of an ICB will include the role of a responsible body (the body charged with authorising arrangements giving rise to a deprivation of liberty) under the Liberty Protection Safeguards.

Each ICB and its partner local authorities will be required to establish an integrated care partnership (ICP), bringing together health, social care, public health (and potentially representatives from the wider sector, such as social care providers or housing providers, where appropriate). The ICP will be tasked with developing a strategy to address the health, social care and public health needs of its system. The ICB and local authorities will have to have regard to that plan when making decisions.

Duty to co-operate

The bill introduces a new power that allows the secretary of state to issue guidance on co-operation between NHS bodies, and between NHS bodies and local authorities. This guidance is intended to give organisations greater clarity about what the duties to cooperate mean in practice.

Adult social care provider payments

This bill makes changes to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 to allow the government to provide financial assistance to all social care providers. Currently, the power is only available in respect of those who operate on a ‘not for profit’ basis. The bill expands the power to include providers operating on a profit-making basis as an ordinary business.

In the February 2021 white paper that preceded the bill, the government justified this measure with reference to the Covid-19 pandemic which, it said, “has demonstrated the need for speed and flexibility in providing support to the social care sector”.

New safeguarding body

The bill establishes a new body, the Health Service Safety Investigation Body (HSSIB), to conduct investigations into incidents that occur during the provision of health care services which have, or may have, implications for the safety of patients. The purpose of the investigation is to identify risks to the safety of patients and address those risks by facilitating the improvement of systems and practices in the provision of health care services in England. The HSSIB has powers to enter and inspect certain premises, inspect and take copies of documents and to obtain information, documents, equipment or other items.

The bill creates a ‘safe space’ within which participants can provide information to the HSSIB for the purposes of an investigation without fear that it will be disclosed to others. Information held in safe space will only be disclosed by the HSSIB in certain limited circumstances. According to the government: “The HSSIB will look to encourage the spread of a culture of learning within the NHS

through promoting better standards for local investigations and improving their quality and effectiveness. To this end, the HSSIB may provide advice, guidance and training to organisations in connection with an investigation upon request.”

Professional regulation

The government will be given new powers under section 60 of the Health Act 1999 to:

  • Abolish an individual health and care professional regulatory body where the professions concerned have been deregulated or are being regulated by another body;
  • Remove a profession from regulation where regulation is no longer required for the protection of the public; and
  • Regulate groups of workers concerned with health and care, whether or not they are generally regarded as a profession ie senior managers and leaders.

These new powers will apply in respect of healthcare professionals and social care workers in England, but not registered social workers.

Information sharing and standards

There are various data provisions in the bill which are intended to enable increased sharing and more effective use of data across the health and adult social care system. These include:

  • The introduction of mandatory information standards which health and social care commissioners and providers will be required to comply with. This will aim to ensure a standardised approach to the collection, storage and processing of data.
  • A power for relevant health or social care public bodies in England to require the sharing of information (other than personal information) for purposes related to their functions in connection with the provision of health services or adult social care in England.
  • New powers for government and NHS Digital to require providers of adult social case services to provide information relating to themselves, their activities and service users.

Tim Spencer-Lane is a lawyer specialising in mental capacity, mental health and social care law and legal editor of Community Care Inform. 

5 Responses to What the Health and Care Bill means for social workers

  1. Mark Holloway July 14, 2021 at 8:55 am #

    Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? Or not?

    It is difficult to tell presently (I believe) how this will actually impact on the ground for a client/patient at the interface between Health and Social Care. I suspect in practice that the CQC changes will be the ones to watch?

    Quite how the ICB’s will manage their LPS obligations when their forerunners, CCG’s, have not done, will be potentially messy.

  2. Pete Feldon July 14, 2021 at 12:35 pm #

    Excellent summary from Tim, and particularly thanks for drawing our attention to the government’s justification for removing the delayed discharge regime. This proposal is building on discharge to assess developments that are already in place.There are good intentions behind this through ensuring the safe discharge into familiar environments which thus leads to more appropriate evaluations. But the way this change has been applied has led to concerns about the lack of involvement of people with health and social care needs in making decisions about their care and treatment, and overriding some of the principles of the Care Act (2014) and the Mental Capacity Act (2005). Some people are being provided with services to facilitate discharge that mitigate against them achieving a degree of independence and thus at a greater cost to the public purse in the long run. Social workers will want to be assured that the subsequent guidance on hospital discharge addresses these concerns.

    • elaine keep July 18, 2021 at 7:47 am #

      Yes, I was seriously concerned about “discharge to assess”- discharging people to care homes rather than the full MCA/ enabling discussions which should be happening. Also discharged without choice is not care act complaint in my view. Many people were discharged very far from their homes or family. What are the chances of rehabilitation and return home after that?

  3. Lou Hooper July 16, 2021 at 10:22 am #

    Hmm lots of extra responsibilities and no mention of any extra funding. I echo Mark Holloway, Plus ça change! Still we live in hope!

  4. Claire Henderson July 20, 2021 at 8:28 am #

    Lots of extra responsibilities on an already stretched workforce, many vacancies and teams that are short staffed. Also what about funding, will this apply to social care as well as the NHS.
    Lets hope the new changes will benefit the service user the most as they should be considered to be the important person in any assessments, in what is a woefully overloaded and unfunded health and social care service in this country..lets see if the government puts their money where there mouth is!

Leave a Reply