Ethnic minority care workers in more insecure work than white peers, finds watchdog

Equality and Human Rights Commission study finds almost three-quarters of home care staff from ethnic minority communities on zero-hours contracts, and warns social care data gaps may mask discrimination

Care worker and older woman
Copyright: iStocck

Care workers from ethnic minority groups are more likely than their white British colleagues to experience insecure working conditions, research has found.

Data commissioned by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), forming found ethnic minority staff in the independent care sector were likelier than white peers to be on zero-hours contracts.

Among home care workers in the independent sector, 71% of ethnic minority workers were on zero-hours contracts as of March 2020, compared with 59% of White British workers.

The study report acknowledged that the discrepancy around the use of zero-hours contracts was probably for “complex and multifaceted reasons” and that some workers found their flexibility helpful.

But it warned that the “fragmented” nature of the underfunded social care sector, the large number of providers, as well as the use of zero-hours contracts and agency staff, made it more difficult for workers to be aware of their rights.

“This has a greater impact on ethnic minority workers who, as previously noted, are more likely to work in the independent care sector while being on zero-hours contracts,” the report said.

Pressure to work

The data, provided by Skills for Care, was collected as part of a wide-ranging study looking at the treatment of lower-paid ethnic minority workers in health and social care,

The data also revealed that ethnic minority care workers were slightly less likely to be on permanent contracts compared with White British colleagues (83% vs 91%) and slightly more likely to be on temporary (6% vs 2%) or bank/pool contracts (8% vs 6%).

One ethnic minority worker on an insecure contract who contributed to the study described feeling “pressure to come back to work” during the pandemic despite being told to self-isolate.

“I was losing money, which I knew would affect me, it did affect me,” they said. “I’m not the only one, it’s going to affect a lot of people and because of that, most people that are supposed to self-isolate, they are not going to do that.”

The study heard that lower-paid ethnic minority workers across the health and social care sectors were less likely to raise concerns at work for fear that they could lose their job – especially those in insecure roles or on zero-hours contracts.

“They don’t think they would be listened to or protected, or that their rights would be upheld,” the report said. “Some contributors told us how workers were sometimes victimised after raising concerns.”

Lack of data ‘may allow discrimination to pass unnoticed’

The survey report warned that, in general, there was much less robust data available across social care than the NHS, including in relation to racial discrimination, and fewer support networks available to workers.

Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the EHRC, said it was “troubling” that a lack of good data may allow discrimination to pass unnoticed.

“Robust workforce data is crucial so organisations know who works for them and what their employees’ experiences are, so they can take action to end bad practice,” she said.

The watchdog called on social care employers and commissioners to:

  • Ensure leaders work to develop a culture where concerns can be shared freely in the confidence that action will follow.
  • Work with trade unions and employer bodies to ensure lower-paid workers are able to share feedback and concerns.
  • Ensure that mechanisms are in place to address barriers that prevent lower-paid ethnic minority and migrant workers from speaking up.

It also said the UK government and its Scottish and Welsh counterparts should work with the health and social care sectors to mandate training for middle managers who handle workforce complaints, including concerns raised on grounds of race.

‘Workforce must be respected’

“Our inquiry findings and recommendations will help equality and human rights law to be upheld,” said Baroness Falkner. “We will work with government, the NHS, local authorities, regulators and care providers to ensure that the working conditions of lower-paid workers in this sector are improved and that their crucial contribution to our health and our economy is recognised.”

Responding to the findings, UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea said: “Black workers make a vital contribution to the health and care sector but are all too often at the bottom of the pay scale [and] frequently face shocking discrimination, threatening their health, job security and life chances.

“Reversing decades of underfunding, privatisation and hostile immigration policies that allow discrimination to thrive are the way to make a lasting difference,” she added.

McAnea said the government could “begin to put things right” by embedding the real living wage, guaranteeing ​proper wage rises and ensuring ​decent sick pay.

“Investment in training and development to improve the chances for neglected staff will also help turn things around,” she said. “But lofty words about reforming health and social care won’t mean a thing unless the workforce are treated properly, ​respected and given the opportunities they deserve to access higher paid roles.”

,

4 Responses to Ethnic minority care workers in more insecure work than white peers, finds watchdog

  1. Clinton June 16, 2022 at 11:01 am #

    This report would make greater sense if we are also told the percentages for “ethnic minority” and “white” home care staffand the percentage of senior and managerial staff who are from an “ethnic minority” or are white.

  2. Tahin June 17, 2022 at 11:02 am #

    Hardly surprising when the social work establishment, otherwise known as Commissioners, are so embedded in the conviction that ‘business’ is the way to provide care services. Accept the status quo, strive to make the ‘market’ “work” but be confused that inequality and discrimination drives the model? Willful blind spots more than naivety is my conclusion. If your conviction is in getting “value for money” while not questioning who really pays the price for the extracted “value”, you are no better than any exploiting business owner. Next time ADASS proclaim their “committment” to justice, human rights and anti-racism please remember this.

    • Kelly June 18, 2022 at 5:15 pm #

      Unrealistic view. ADASS isn’t some leftwing student debating group. Its members live in the real world and have to comply with the law. Councils rarely delivered good care services. What you decry as business delivers person centered care more than it fails to. I am also dubious about the conclusions of this survey. It would be interesting to know the methodology. In my experience racist, cynical and profit driven people don’t set up care services. I think ADASS recognises that too.

      • Tahin June 20, 2022 at 8:30 am #

        You are absolutely right Kelly. Penalising workers if they go a tad over providing 15 minutes of home care, seeing nothing wrong in putting people to bed in the early afternoon with incontinence pads, deducting pay for “providing” uniforms workers have to buy from the company, no sick pay, no travel allowance, spurious “fees” for often not delivered training are all evidence of how wrong I am. My apologies. You are also spot on about ADASS, they are indeed not “left wing”.

Leave a Reply